CMC approval process
CMC approval
Three fundamental elements
The three fundamental elements leading to approval of an Institute's CMCs are:
Participation by the Institute in reviewed and approved scientific comparisons;
Operation by the Institute of an appropriate and approved quality management system;
International peer-review (regional and inter-regional) of claimed calibration and measurement capabilities.
For CMC Writers
Preparing a CMC submission
The 3-point Checklist is for CMC Writers to confirm preparedness of a submission against the acceptance criteria before submitting the CMC claim for review.
3-point Checklist →After publication
Monitoring the validity of published CMCs
Participation in comparisons and confirmation of the consistency of the results with the CMCs is an important method to monitor the validity of CMCs.
Confirmation of the quality management system used to support the CMCs is undertaken by the Regional Metrology Organizations (RMOs). It shall include methods below to achieve this monitoring.
- Review of annual reports of the Institutes
- A periodic review at the same level as the initial review, undertaken at an interval not exceeding five years.
CMC requirements
When a CMC does not fulfil the requirements under the CIPM MRA
CMCs that do not fulfil the requirements are either placed under temporary withdrawal ("Greyed-Out") or deleted from the KCDB. Greyed-Out CMCs are reinstated according to an established confirmation process to ensure that the CMC acceptance criteria are again fulfilled.
CIPM MRA
Operation of the CIPM MRA
The JCRB is responsible for the coordination of data provided by the RMOs, and other actions undertaken by them to promote confidence in calibration and measurement certificates. The JCRB operates under the auspices of the CIPM and comprises representatives of the RMOs. The BIPM Director chairs the JCRB, supported by the JCRB Executive Secretary, and the BIPM maintains the CIPM MRA database (KCDB).