CCM.F-K3.a and CCM.F-K3.b

MEASURAND : Force
NOMINAL VALUE : 500 kN

 

Degrees of equivalence Di and expanded uncertainty Ui (k = 2) expressed in 10-6

 

CCM.F-K3.a

MEASURAND : Force
NOMINAL VALUE : 1 MN

 

Degrees of equivalence Di and expanded uncertainty Ui (k = 2)
expressed in 10-6

 

CCM.F-K3.a and CCM.F-K3.b

MEASURAND : Force
NOMINAL VALUE : 500 kN

 

Degrees of equivalence relative to the CCM.F-K3 reference value:

 

Results are presented under A4 printable format in Summary Results (PDF file).

CCM.F-K3.a

MEASURAND : Force
NOMINAL VALUE : 1 MN

 

Degrees of equivalence relative to the CCM.F-K3 reference value:

 

Results are presented under A4 printable format in Summary Results (PDF file).

Comparison
Comparison close
CC comparison
Linked comparison
CCM.F-K3.a
Metrology area, Sub-field Mass and related quantities, Force
Description High force measurements
Time of measurements 2005 - 2007
Status Approved for equivalence
Final Reports of the comparisons
Measurand Force: 0 MN, 0.5 MN and 1 MN
Transfer device Force transducer
Comparison type Key Comparison
Consultative Committee CCM (Consultative Committee for Mass and Related Quantities)
Conducted by CCM (Consultative Committee for Mass and Related Quantities)
Comments

Results published on 20 December 2018

Comparison of high force measurements 

Pilot institute PTB
Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt
Germany
Contact person R. Kumme

+49 531 592 1200
First Name Last Name
wwww@ww.www +356719836 Institute 1 Institute 1 Khmelnitskiy
Pilot laboratory
PTB

Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt, Germany, EURAMET

NIM

National Institute of Metrology, China, APMP

NIST

National Institute of Standards and Technology, United States, SIM

NPL

National Physical Laboratory, United Kingdom, EURAMET

VNIIM

D.I. Mendeleyev Institute for Metrology, Rosstandart, Russian Federation, COOMET

CCM.F-K3.a and CCM.F-K3.b

MEASURAND : Force
NOMINAL VALUE : 500 kN

 

The key comparison reference value, xR, is calculated as the weighted mean of the corrected measurement results from CCM.F-K3.a and CCM.F-K3.b. Correlations were considered when evaluating the associated standard uncertainty, uR.

 

The degree of equivalence of each laboratory with respect to the key comparison reference reference value is given by a pair of terms, both expressed in 10-6: Di , where Di is the relative reviation of the final result from xR, and Ui, its expanded uncertainty
(k = 2).

 

CCM.F-K3.a

MEASURAND : Force
NOMINAL VALUE : 1 MN

 

The key comparison reference value, xR, is calculated as the weighted mean of the corrected measurement results from CCM.F-K3.a. Correlations were considered when evaluating the associated standard uncertainty, uR.

 

The degree of equivalence of each laboratory with respect to the key comparison reference reference value is given by a pair of terms, both expressed in 10-6: Di , where Di is the relative reviation of the final result from xR, and Ui, its expanded uncertainty
(k = 2).

 

CCM.F-K3.a and CCM.F-K3.b

MEASURAND : Force
NOMINAL VALUE : 500 kN

CCM.F-K3.a: Two force steps of 500 kN were employed.

CCM.F-K3.b: Two compression force transducers of 500 kN and one force step of 500 kN were emplyed.

Measurements were carried out from 2005 to 2011.

The measurement results for CCM.F-K3.a and CCM.F-K3.b are presented in Section 7 (pp. 6 to 17) of the CCM.F-K3 Final report.

 

CCM.F-K3.a

MEASURAND : Force
NOMINAL VALUE : 1 MN

CCM.F-K3.a: Two compression force transducers of 1 MN were employed.

 

Measurements were carried out from 2005 to 2011.

The measurement results for CCM.F-K3.a are presented in Section 7 (pp. 6 to 17) of the CCM.F-K3 Final report.