CCEM-K5, EUROMET.EM-K5, EUROMET.EM-K5.1, SIM.EM-K5 and COOMET.EM-K5
MEASURAND: Electric power at 120 V, 5 A, 53 Hz, power factor 1.0
NOMINAL VALUE: 600 VA, 600 W
Degrees of equivalence: Di = xi - xR and expanded uncertainty Ui (k = 2),
both expressed in µW/VA
Click on the graph for a closer view
Red: participants in CCEM-K5
Dark blue: participants in EUROMET.EM-K5
Green: participants in EUROMET.EM-K5.1
Orange: participants in SIM.EM-K5
Purple: participants in COOMET.EM-K5
The acronym "UMTS" stands for "Ukrmetrteststandard".
CCEM-K5, EUROMET.EM-K5, EUROMET.EM-K5.1, SIM.EM-K5 and COOMET.EM-K5
MEASURAND: Electric power at 120 V, 5 A, 53 Hz, power factor 0.5 lead
NOMINAL VALUE: 600 VA, 300 W
Degrees of equivalence: Di = xi - xR and expanded uncertainty Ui (k = 2),
both expressed in µW/VA
Click on the graph for a closer view
Red: participants in CCEM-K5
Dark blue: participants in EUROMET.EM-K5
Green: participants in EUROMET.EM-K5.1
Orange: participants in SIM.EM-K5
Purple: participants in COOMET.EM-K5
The acronym "UMTS" stands for "Ukrmetrteststandard".
CCEM-K5, EUROMET.EM-K5, EUROMET.EM-K5.1, SIM.EM-K5 and COOMET.EM-K5
MEASURAND: Electric power at 120 V, 5 A, 53 Hz, power factor 0.5 lag
NOMINAL VALUE: 600 VA, 300 W
Degrees of equivalence: Di = xi - xR and expanded uncertainty Ui (k = 2),
both expressed in µW/VA
Click on the graph for a closer view
Red: participants in CCEM-K5
Dark blue: participants in EUROMET.EM-K5
Green: participants in EUROMET.EM-K5.1
Orange: participants in SIM.EM-K5
Purple: participants in COOMET.EM-K5
The acronym "UMTS" stands for "Ukrmetrteststandard".
CCEM-K5, EUROMET.EM-K5, EUROMET.EM-K5.1, SIM.EM-K5 and COOMET.EM-K5
MEASURAND: Electric power at 120 V, 5 A, 53 Hz, power factor 0.0 lead
NOMINAL VALUE: 600 VA, 0 W
Degrees of equivalence: Di = xi - xR and expanded uncertainty Ui (k = 2),
both expressed in µW/VA
Click on the graph for a closer view
Red: participants in CCEM-K5
Dark blue: participants in EUROMET.EM-K5
Green: participants in EUROMET.EM-K5.1
Purple: participants in COOMET.EM-K5
The acronym "UMTS" stands for "Ukrmetrteststandard".
CCEM-K5, EUROMET.EM-K5, EUROMET.EM-K5.1, SIM.EM-K5 and COOMET.EM-K5
MEASURAND: Electric power at 120 V, 5 A, 53 Hz, power factor 0.0 lag
NOMINAL VALUE: 600 VA, 0 W
Degrees of equivalence: Di = xi - xR and expanded uncertainty Ui (k = 2),
both expressed in µW/VA
Click on the graph for a closer view
Red: participants in CCEM-K5
Dark blue: participants in EUROMET.EM-K5
Green: participants in EUROMET.EM-K5.1
Purple: participants in COOMET.EM-K5
The acronym "UMTS" stands for "Ukrmetrteststandard".
CCEM-K5, EUROMET.EM-K5, EUROMET.EM-K5.1, SIM.EM-K5 and COOMET.EM-K5
MEASURAND: Electric power at 120 V, 5 A, 53 Hz, power factor 1.0
NOMINAL VALUE: 600 VA, 600 W
Degrees of equivalence: Di = xi - xR and expanded uncertainty Ui (k = 2),
both expressed in µW/VA
Red: participants in CCEM-K5
Dark blue: participants in EUROMET.EM-K5
Green: participants in EUROMET.EM-K5.1
Orange: participants in SIM.EM-K5
Purple: participants in COOMET.EM-K5
The acronym "UMTS" stands for "Ukrmetrteststandard".
Results are presented under A4 printable format in Summary Results (PDF file).
CCEM-K5, EUROMET.EM-K5, EUROMET.EM-K5.1, SIM.EM-K5 and COOMET.EM-K5
MEASURAND: Electric power at 120 V, 5 A, 53 Hz, power factor 0.5 lead
NOMINAL VALUE: 600 VA, 300 W
Degrees of equivalence: Di = xi - xR and expanded uncertainty Ui (k = 2),
both expressed in µW/VA
Red: participants in CCEM-K5
Dark blue: participants in EUROMET.EM-K5
Green: participants in EUROMET.EM-K5.1
Orange: participants in SIM.EM-K5
Purple: participants in COOMET.EM-K5
The acronym "UMTS" stands for "Ukrmetrteststandard".
Results are presented under A4 printable format in Summary Results (PDF file).
CCEM-K5, EUROMET.EM-K5, EUROMET.EM-K5.1, SIM.EM-K5 and COOMET.EM-K5
MEASURAND: Electric power at 120 V, 5 A, 53 Hz, power factor 0.5 lag
NOMINAL VALUE: 600 VA, 300 W
Degrees of equivalence: Di = xi - xR and expanded uncertainty Ui (k = 2),
both expressed in µW/VA
Red: participants in CCEM-K5
Dark blue: participants in EUROMET.EM-K5
Green: participants in EUROMET.EM-K5.1
Orange: participants in SIM.EM-K5
Purple: participants in COOMET.EM-K5
The acronym "UMTS" stands for "Ukrmetrteststandard".
Results are presented under A4 printable format in Summary Results (PDF file).
CCEM-K5, EUROMET.EM-K5, EUROMET.EM-K5.1, SIM.EM-K5 and COOMET.EM-K5
MEASURAND: Electric power at 120 V, 5 A, 53 Hz, power factor 0.0 lead
NOMINAL VALUE: 600 VA, 0 W
Degrees of equivalence: Di = xi - xR and expanded uncertainty Ui (k = 2),
both expressed in µW/VA
Red: participants in CCEM-K5
Dark blue: participants in EUROMET.EM-K5
Green: participants in EUROMET.EM-K5.1
Purple: participants in COOMET.EM-K5
The acronym "UMTS" stands for "Ukrmetrteststandard".
Results are presented under A4 printable format in Summary Results (PDF file).
CCEM-K5, EUROMET.EM-K5, EUROMET.EM-K5.1, SIM.EM-K5 and COOMET.EM-K5
MEASURAND: Electric power at 120 V, 5 A, 53 Hz, power factor 0.0 lag
NOMINAL VALUE: 600 VA, 0 W
Degrees of equivalence: Di = xi - xR and expanded uncertainty Ui (k = 2),
both expressed in µW/VA
Red: participants in CCEM-K5
Dark blue: participants in EUROMET.EM-K5
Green: participants in EUROMET.EM-K5.1
Purple: participants in COOMET.EM-K5
The acronym "UMTS" stands for "Ukrmetrteststandard".
Results are presented under A4 printable format in Summary Results (PDF file).
| Metrology area, Sub-field | Electricity and Magnetism, AC Voltage, Current, Power, and AC/DC Transfer |
| Description | AC power at 50/60 Hz |
| Time of measurements | 1996 - 2000 |
| Status | Approved for equivalence |
| Final Reports of the comparisons | |
| Measurand | AC power; 120 V, 5 A, at 53 Hz |
| Parameters | Power factor: 1.0, 0.5 Lead, 0.5 Lag, 0.0 Lead, 0.0 Lag |
| Transfer device | Power transducer |
| Comparison type | Key Comparison |
| Consultative Committee | CCEM (Consultative Committee for Electricity and Magnetism) |
| Conducted by | CCEM (Consultative Committee for Electricity and Magnetism) |
| Comments | Results published on 22 January 2003 EUROMET.EM-K5, EUROMET.EM-K5.1, SIM.EM-K5 and COOMET.EM-K5 results are linked to those of CCEM-K5 AC power : |
| Pilot institute |
NIST
National Institute of Standards and Technology United States |
| Contact person | N. Oldham +1 301 975 2408 |
| Pilot laboratory | |
|---|---|
| NIST |
National Institute of Standards and Technology, United States, SIM |
| CENAM |
Centro Nacional de Metrologia, Mexico, SIM |
| INMETRO |
Instituto Nacional de Metrologia, Qualidade e Tecnologia, Brazil, SIM |
| INTI |
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Industrial, Argentina, SIM |
| MSL |
Measurement Standards Laboratory, New Zealand, APMP |
| NIM |
National Institute of Metrology, China, APMP |
| NPL |
National Physical Laboratory, United Kingdom, EURAMET |
| NRC |
National Research Council, Canada, SIM |
| PTB |
Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt, Germany, EURAMET |
| VNIIM |
D.I. Mendeleyev Institute for Metrology, Rosstandart, Russian Federation, COOMET |
This page proposes print-out on A4 paper (portrait) of the comparison details (best printed out using a black and white printer).
Please, select items to be printed out, then click on "OK" :
CCEM-K5, EUROMET.EM-K5, EUROMET.EM-K5.1, SIM.EM-K5 and COOMET.EM-K5
MEASURAND: Electric power at 120 V, 5 A, 53 Hz, power factor 1.0
NOMINAL VALUE: 600 VA, 600 W
| The key comparison reference value, xR, is calculated as the weighted mean of the difference between laboratory i and the predicted value, based on measurements performed at the pilot laboratory. Its standard uncertainty, uR, is calculated as the uncertainty of the weighted mean of the differences. |
xR = 7 µW/VA and uR = 5 µW/VA
| The degree of equivalence of each laboratory with respect to the key comparison reference value is given by a pair of terms: Di and Ui, its expanded uncertainty (k = 2), both expressed in µW/VA. The derivation of these terms can be found in the CCEM-K5 Final Report. |
| When required, the degree of equivalence between two laboratories i and j is given by a pair of terms: Dij and Uij, its expanded uncertainty (k = 2), both expressed in µW/VA. The derivation of these terms can also be found in the CCEM-K5 Final Report. |
The linkage between EUROMET.EM-K5 and CCEM-K5 is computed as explained in the EUROMET.EM-K5 Linkage Report. The INRIM, NPL, PTB and SP participated in both comparisons. The common participants at the exception of SP were used as linking laboratories as explained on page 1 of the Linkage Report.
PTB as participant in both comparisons ensures the linkage, which is computed as explained in the EUROMET.EM-K5.1 Linkage Report.
It was possible to link SIM.EM-K5 results to those of CCEM-K5 for the power factors 1.0, 0.5 Lead and 0.5 Lag as explained in the Addendum to the SIM.EM-K5 Final Report.
NIST, NRC, INTI, INMETRO and CENAM ensure the linkage.
The results obtained in COOMET.EM-K5 for each power factor was linked to CCEM-K5 via NIM and VNIIM who participated in both comparisons. The linking process is described in the COOMET.EM-K5 Linkage Report.
CCEM-K5, EUROMET.EM-K5, EUROMET.EM-K5.1, SIM.EM-K5 and COOMET.EM-K5
MEASURAND: Electric power at 120 V, 5 A, 53 Hz, power factor 0.5 lead
NOMINAL VALUE: 600 VA, 300 W
| The key comparison reference value, xR, is calculated as the weighted mean of the difference between laboratory i and the predicted value, based on measurements performed at the pilot laboratory. Its standard uncertainty, uR, is calculated as the uncertainty of the weighted mean of the differences. |
xR = -1 µW/VA and uR = 5 µW/VA
| The degree of equivalence of each laboratory with respect to the key comparison reference value is given by a pair of terms: Di and Ui, its expanded uncertainty (k = 2), both expressed in µW/VA. The derivation of these terms can be found in the CCEM-K5 Final Report. |
| When required, the degree of equivalence between two laboratories i and j is given by a pair of terms: Dij and Uij, its expanded uncertainty (k = 2), both expressed in µW/VA. The derivation of these terms can also be found in the CCEM-K5 Final Report. |
The linkage between EUROMET.EM-K5 and CCEM-K5 is computed as explained in the EUROMET.EM-K5 Linkage Report. The INRIM, NPL, PTB and SP participated in both comparisons. The common participants at the exception of SP were used as linking laboratories as explained on page 1 of the Linkage Report.
PTB as participant in both comparisons ensures the linkage, which is computed as explained in the EUROMET.EM-K5.1 Linkage Report.
It was possible to link SIM.EM-K5 results to those of CCEM-K5 for the power factors 1.0, 0.5 Lead and 0.5 Lag as explained in the Addendum to the SIM.EM-K5 Final Report.
NIST, NRC, INTI, INMETRO and CENAM ensure the linkage.
The results obtained in COOMET.EM-K5 for each power factor was linked to CCEM-K5 via NIM and VNIIM who participated in both comparisons. The linking process is described in the COOMET.EM-K5 Linkage Report.
CCEM-K5, EUROMET.EM-K5, EUROMET.EM-K5.1, SIM.EM-K5 and COOMET.EM-K5
MEASURAND: Electric power at 120 V, 5 A, 53 Hz, power factor 0.5 lag
NOMINAL VALUE: 600 VA, 300 W
| The key comparison reference value, xR, is calculated as the weighted mean of the difference between laboratory i and the predicted value, based on measurements performed at the pilot laboratory. Its standard uncertainty, uR, is calculated as the uncertainty of the weighted mean of the differences. |
xR = -1 µW/VA and uR = 5 µW/VA
| The degree of equivalence of each laboratory with respect to the key comparison reference value is given by a pair of terms: Di and Ui, its expanded uncertainty (k = 2), both expressed in µW/VA. The derivation of these terms can be found in the CCEM-K5 Final Report. |
| When required, the degree of equivalence between two laboratories i and j is given by a pair of terms: Dij and Uij, its expanded uncertainty (k = 2), both expressed in µW/VA. The derivation of these terms can also be found in the CCEM-K5 Final Report. |
The linkage between EUROMET.EM-K5 and CCEM-K5 is computed as explained in the EUROMET.EM-K5 Linkage Report. The INRIM, NPL, PTB and SP participated in both comparisons. The common participants at the exception of SP were used as linking laboratories as explained on page 1 of the Linkage Report.
PTB as participant in both comparisons ensures the linkage, which is computed as explained in the EUROMET.EM-K5.1 Linkage Report.
It was possible to link SIM.EM-K5 results to those of CCEM-K5 for the power factors 1.0, 0.5 Lead and 0.5 Lag as explained in the Addendum to the SIM.EM-K5 Final Report.
NIST, NRC, INTI, INMETRO and CENAM ensure the linkage.
The results obtained in COOMET.EM-K5 for each power factor was linked to CCEM-K5 via NIM and VNIIM who participated in both comparisons. The linking process is described in the COOMET.EM-K5 Linkage Report.
CCEM-K5, EUROMET.EM-K5, EUROMET.EM-K5.1, SIM.EM-K5 and COOMET.EM-K5
MEASURAND: Electric power at 120 V, 5 A, 53 Hz, power factor 0.0 lead
NOMINAL VALUE: 600 VA, 0 W
| The key comparison reference value, xR, is calculated as the weighted mean of the difference between laboratory i and the predicted value, based on measurements performed at the pilot laboratory. Its standard uncertainty, uR, is calculated as the uncertainty of the weighted mean of the differences. |
xR = 0 µW/VA and uR = 5 µW/VA
| The degree of equivalence of each laboratory with respect to the key comparison reference value is given by a pair of terms: Di and Ui, its expanded uncertainty (k = 2), both expressed in µW/VA. The derivation of these terms can be found in the CCEM-K5 Final Report. |
| When required, the degree of equivalence between two laboratories i and j is given by a pair of terms: Dij and Uij, its expanded uncertainty (k = 2), both expressed in µW/VA. The derivation of these terms can also be found in the CCEM-K5 Final Report. |
The linkage between EUROMET.EM-K5 and CCEM-K5 is computed as explained in the EUROMET.EM-K5 Linkage Report. The INRIM, NPL, PTB and SP participated in both comparisons. The common participants at the exception of SP were used as linking laboratories as explained on page 1 of the Linkage Report.
PTB as participant in both comparisons ensures the linkage, which is computed as explained in the EUROMET.EM-K5.1 Linkage Report.
It was possible to link SIM.EM-K5 results to those of CCEM-K5 for the power factors 1.0, 0.5 Lead and 0.5 Lag as explained in the Addendum to the SIM.EM-K5 Final Report.
NIST, NRC, INTI, INMETRO and CENAM ensure the linkage.
The results obtained in COOMET.EM-K5 for each power factor was linked to CCEM-K5 via NIM and VNIIM who participated in both comparisons. The linking process is described in the COOMET.EM-K5 Linkage Report.
CCEM-K5, EUROMET.EM-K5, EUROMET.EM-K5.1, SIM.EM-K5 and COOMET.EM-K5
MEASURAND: Electric power at 120 V, 5 A, 53 Hz, power factor 0.0 lag
NOMINAL VALUE: 600 VA, 0 W
| The key comparison reference value, xR, is calculated as the weighted mean of the difference between laboratory i and the predicted value, based on measurements performed at the pilot laboratory. Its standard uncertainty, uR, is calculated as the uncertainty of the weighted mean of the differences. |
xR = -3 µW/VA and uR = 5 µW/VA
| The degree of equivalence of each laboratory with respect to the key comparison reference value is given by a pair of terms: Di and Ui, its expanded uncertainty (k = 2), both expressed in µW/VA. The derivation of these terms can be found in the CCEM-K5 Final Report. |
| When required, the degree of equivalence between two laboratories i and j is given by a pair of terms: Dij and Uij, its expanded uncertainty (k = 2), both expressed in µW/VA. The derivation of these terms can also be found in the CCEM-K5 Final Report. |
The linkage between EUROMET.EM-K5 and CCEM-K5 is computed as explained in the EUROMET.EM-K5 Linkage Report. The INRIM, NPL, PTB and SP participated in both comparisons. The common participants at the exception of SP were used as linking laboratories as explained on page 1 of the Linkage Report.
PTB as participant in both comparisons ensures the linkage, which is computed as explained in the EUROMET.EM-K5.1 Linkage Report.
It was possible to link SIM.EM-K5 results to those of CCEM-K5 for the power factors 1.0, 0.5 Lead and 0.5 Lag as explained in the Addendum to the SIM.EM-K5 Final Report.
NIST, NRC, INTI, INMETRO and CENAM ensure the linkage.
The results obtained in COOMET.EM-K5 for each power factor was linked to CCEM-K5 via NIM and VNIIM who participated in both comparisons. The linking process is described in the COOMET.EM-K5 Linkage Report.
CCEM-K5, EUROMET.EM-K5, EUROMET.EM-K5.1, SIM.EM-K5 and COOMET.EM-K5
MEASURAND: Electric power at 120 V, 5 A, 53 Hz, power factor 1.0
NOMINAL VALUE: 600 VA, 600 W
xi : deviation from nominal measured by laboratory i
ui : standard combined uncertainty of xi
| Lab i | xi / (µW/VA) |
ui / (µW/VA) |
Date of measurement |
| NRC | 29 | 6 | Jun 96 |
| NIST | 26 | 7 | Jul 96 |
| PTB | 23 | 7 | Aug 96 |
| SP | -10 | 15 | Sep 96 |
| NIST | 27 | 7 | Oct 96 |
| NMIA | 31 | 7 | Nov 96 |
| MSL | 66 | 34 | Dec 96 |
| NIST | 22 | 7 | Feb 97 |
| NPL | 38 | 16 | Mar 97 |
| INRIM | 23 | 15 | Apr 97 |
| NIST | 21 | 7 | May 97 |
| INTI | 42 | 10 | Aug 97 |
| NIST | 22 | 7 | Sep 97 |
| NIST | 20 | 7 | Nov 97 |
| NIM | 37 | 6 | Mar 98 |
| NIST | 14 | 7 | Apr 98 |
| VNIIM | 30 | 9 | Jun 98 |
| NRC | 14 | 6 | Sep 98 |
| NIST | 9 | 7 | Nov 98 |
| SPRING | 38 | 31 | Dec 98 |
| CSIR-NML | -21 | 30 | Feb 99 |
| NIST | 8 | 7 | Mar 99 |
| PTB | 15 | 5 | May 99 |
| NIST | 8 | 7 | Jun 99 |
| INMETRO | 6 | 30 | Aug 99 |
| CENAM | 19 | 17 | Aug 99 |
| NIST | 10 | 7 | Sep 99 |
| NIST | 9 | 7 | Jun 00 |
| NIM | 20 | 6 | Jul 00 |
| MSL | 20 | 14 | Aug 00 |
| NIST | 17 | 7 | Aug 00 |
| CSIR-NML | 13 | 40 | Sep 00 |
| SP | 27 | 15 | Oct 00 |
| NIST | 21 | 7 | Nov 00 |
The results of mesurements obtained by the participants in EURAMET.EM-K5 are given in Table 2 p. 5 of the Final Report.
The results of mesurements obtained by participants in EUROMET.EM-K5.1 are given in Table 2 on page 7 of the EUROMET.EM-K5.1 Final Report.
The results of mesurements obtained by the participants in SIM.EM-K5 are given in Tables B.1 to B.8 on pages 29 to 36 of the Final Report.
The results of mesurements obtained by the participants in COOMET.EM-K5 are given in Table 8 on pages 20 to 22 of the Final Report.
CCEM-K5, EUROMET.EM-K5, EUROMET.EM-K5.1, SIM.EM-K5 and COOMET.EM-K5
MEASURAND: Electric power at 120 V, 5 A, 53 Hz, power factor 0.5 lead
NOMINAL VALUE: 600 VA, 300 W
xi : deviation from nominal measured by laboratory i
ui : standard combined uncertainty of xi
| Lab i | xi / (µW/VA) |
ui / (µW/VA) |
Date of measurement |
| NRC | 26 | 6 | Jun 96 |
| NIST | 17 | 7 | Jul 96 |
| PTB | 9 | 7 | Aug 96 |
| SP | -5 | 11 | Sep 96 |
| NIST | 20 | 7 | Oct 96 |
| NMIA | 15 | 8 | Nov 96 |
| MSL | 27 | 24 | Dec 96 |
| NIST | 17 | 7 | Feb 97 |
| NPL | 2 | 13 | Mar 97 |
| INRIM | 4 | 15 | Apr 97 |
| NIST | 12 | 7 | May 97 |
| INTI | 20 | 17 | Aug 97 |
| NIST | 15 | 7 | Sep 97 |
| NIST | 12 | 7 | Nov 97 |
| NIM | -2 | 4 | Mar 98 |
| NIST | 5 | 7 | Apr 98 |
| VNIIM | -8 | 14 | Jun 98 |
| NRC | 11 | 6 | Sep 98 |
| NIST | 5 | 7 | Nov 98 |
| SPRING | 3 | 31 | Dec 98 |
| CSIR-NML | -6 | 30 | Feb 99 |
| NIST | 6 | 7 | Mar 99 |
| PTB | -1 | 5 | May 99 |
| NIST | 8 | 7 | Jun 99 |
| INMETRO | 21 | 30 | Aug 99 |
| CENAM | 4 | 17 | Aug 99 |
| NIST | 4 | 7 | Sep 99 |
| NIST | 11 | 7 | Jun 00 |
| NIM | 23 | 6 | Jul 00 |
| MSL | 16 | 15 | Aug 00 |
| NIST | 12 | 7 | Aug 00 |
| CSIR-NML | -1 | 40 | Sep 00 |
| SP | 6 | 11 | Oct 00 |
| NIST | 11 | 7 | Nov 00 |
The results of mesurements obtained by the participants in EURAMET.EM-K5 are given in Table 2 p. 5 of the Final Report.
The results of mesurements obtained by participants in EUROMET.EM-K5.1 are given in Table 2 on page 7 of the EUROMET.EM-K5.1 Final Report.
The results of mesurements obtained by the participants in SIM.EM-K5 are given in Tables B.1 to B.8 on pages 29 to 36 of the Final Report.
The results of mesurements obtained by the participants in COOMET.EM-K5 are given in Table 8 on pages 20 to 22 of the Final Report.
CCEM-K5, EUROMET.EM-K5, EUROMET.EM-K5.1, SIM.EM-K5 and COOMET.EM-K5
MEASURAND: Electric power at 120 V, 5 A, 53 Hz, power factor 0.5 lag
NOMINAL VALUE: 600 VA, 300 W
xi : deviation from nominal measured by laboratory i
ui : standard combined uncertainty of xi
| Lab i | xi / (µW/VA) |
ui / (µW/VA) |
Date of measurement |
| NRC | -27 | 6 | Jun 96 |
| NIST | -24 | 7 | Jul 96 |
| PTB | -18 | 7 | Aug 96 |
| SP | -43 | 11 | Sep 96 |
| NIST | -22 | 7 | Oct 96 |
| NMIA | -20 | 8 | Nov 96 |
| MSL | -4 | 24 | Dec 96 |
| NIST | -25 | 7 | Feb 97 |
| NPL | -4 | 13 | Mar 97 |
| INRIM | -21 | 15 | Apr 97 |
| NIST | -20 | 7 | May 97 |
| INTI | -20 | 17 | Aug 97 |
| NIST | -21 | 7 | Sep 97 |
| NIST | -26 | 7 | Nov 97 |
| NIM | 1 | 4 | Mar 98 |
| NIST | -27 | 7 | Apr 98 |
| VNIIM | -53 | 14 | Jun 98 |
| NRC | -37 | 6 | Sep 98 |
| NIST | -30 | 7 | Nov 98 |
| SPRING | -17 | 31 | Dec 98 |
| CSIR-NML | -45 | 30 | Feb 99 |
| NIST | -32 | 7 | Mar 99 |
| PTB | -18 | 5 | May 99 |
| NIST | -34 | 7 | Jun 99 |
| INMETRO | -56 | 30 | Aug 99 |
| CENAM | -28 | 17 | Aug 99 |
| NIST | -30 | 7 | Sep 99 |
| NIST | -28 | 7 | Jun 00 |
| NIM | -36 | 6 | Jul 00 |
| MSL | -37 | 15 | Aug 00 |
| NIST | -21 | 7 | Aug 00 |
| CSIR-NML | -14 | 40 | Sep 00 |
| SP | -14 | 11 | Oct 00 |
| NIST | -22 | 7 | Nov 00 |
The results of mesurements obtained by the participants in EURAMET.EM-K5 are given in Table 2 p. 5 of the Final Report.
The results of mesurements obtained by participants in EUROMET.EM-K5.1 are given in Table 2 on page 7 of the EUROMET.EM-K5.1 Final Report.
The results of mesurements obtained by the participants in SIM.EM-K5 are given in Tables B.1 to B.8 on pages 29 to 36 of the Final Report.
The results of mesurements obtained by the participants in COOMET.EM-K5 are given in Table 8 on pages 20 to 22 of the Final Report.
CCEM-K5, EUROMET.EM-K5, EUROMET.EM-K5.1, SIM.EM-K5 and COOMET.EM-K5
MEASURAND: Electric power at 120 V, 5 A, 53 Hz, power factor 0.0 lead
NOMINAL VALUE: 600 VA, 0 W
xi : deviation from nominal measured by laboratory i
ui : standard combined uncertainty of xi
| Lab i | xi / (ľW/VA) |
ui / (ľW/VA) |
Date of measurement |
| NRC | -7 | 5 | Jun 96 |
| NIST | -13 | 6 | Jul 96 |
| PTB | -20 | 6 | Aug 96 |
| SP | -18 | 9 | Sep 96 |
| NIST | -7 | 6 | Oct 96 |
| NMIA | -3 | 7 | Nov 96 |
| MSL | -12 | 18 | Dec 96 |
| NIST | -14 | 6 | Feb 97 |
| NPL | -41 | 14 | Mar 97 |
| INRIM | -27 | 15 | Apr 97 |
| NIST | -16 | 6 | May 97 |
| INTI | -9 | 19 | Aug 97 |
| NIST | -13 | 6 | Sep 97 |
| NIST | -13 | 6 | Nov 97 |
| NIM | -40 | 5 | Mar 98 |
| NIST | -20 | 6 | Apr 98 |
| VNIIM | -8 | 12 | Jun 98 |
| NRC | -15 | 5 | Sep 98 |
| NIST | -17 | 6 | Nov 98 |
| SPRING | -36 | 31 | Dec 98 |
| CSIR-NML | -32 | 30 | Feb 99 |
| NIST | -18 | 6 | Mar 99 |
| PTB | -22 | 5 | May 99 |
| NIST | -18 | 6 | Jun 99 |
| INMETRO | -14 | 30 | Aug 99 |
| CENAM | -34 | 27 | Aug 99 |
| NIST | -23 | 6 | Sep 99 |
| NIST | -15 | 6 | Jun 00 |
| NIM | -14 | 6 | Jul 00 |
| MSL | -18 | 16 | Aug 00 |
| NIST | -12 | 6 | Aug 00 |
| CSIR-NML | -43 | 40 | Sep 00 |
| SP | -25 | 9 | Oct 00 |
| NIST | -21 | 6 | Nov 00 |
The results of mesurements obtained by the participants in EURAMET.EM-K5 are given in Table 2 p. 5 of the Final Report.
The results of mesurements obtained by participants in EUROMET.EM-K5.1 are given in Table 2 on page 7 of the EUROMET.EM-K5.1 Final Report.
The results of mesurements obtained by the participants in SIM.EM-K5 are given in Tables B.1 to B.8 on pages 29 to 36 of the Final Report.
The results of mesurements obtained by the participants in COOMET.EM-K5 are given in Table 8 on pages 20 to 22 of the Final Report.
CCEM-K5, EUROMET.EM-K5, EUROMET.EM-K5.1, SIM.EM-K5 and COOMET.EM-K5
MEASURAND: Electric power at 120 V, 5 A, 53 Hz, power factor 0.0 lag
NOMINAL VALUE: 600 VA, 0 W
xi : deviation from nominal measured by laboratory i
ui : standard combined uncertainty of xi
| Lab i | xi / (µW/VA) |
ui / (µW/VA) |
Date of measurement |
| NRC | -68 | 5 | Jun 96 |
| NIST | -59 | 6 | Jul 96 |
| PTB | -53 | 6 | Aug 96 |
| SP | -60 | 9 | Sep 96 |
| NIST | -63 | 6 | Oct 96 |
| NMIA | -62 | 7 | Nov 96 |
| MSL | -73 | 18 | Dec 96 |
| NIST | -54 | 6 | Feb 97 |
| NPL | -44 | 14 | Mar 97 |
| INRIM | -58 | 16 | Apr 97 |
| NIST | -52 | 6 | May 97 |
| INTI | -50 | 19 | Aug 97 |
| NIST | -53 | 6 | Sep 97 |
| NIST | -55 | 6 | Nov 97 |
| NIM | -37 | 4 | Mar 98 |
| NIST | -55 | 6 | Apr 98 |
| VNIIM | -70 | 12 | Jun 98 |
| NRC | -73 | 5 | Sep 98 |
| NIST | -57 | 6 | Nov 98 |
| SPRING | -65 | 31 | Dec 98 |
| CSIR-NML | -54 | 30 | Feb 99 |
| NIST | -58 | 6 | Mar 99 |
| PTB | -56 | 5 | May 99 |
| NIST | -59 | 6 | Jun 99 |
| INMETRO | -77 | 30 | Aug 99 |
| CENAM | -55 | 27 | Aug 99 |
| NIST | -60 | 6 | Sep 99 |
| NIST | -54 | 6 | Jun 00 |
| NIM | -72 | 6 | Jul 00 |
| MSL | -69 | 16 | Aug 00 |
| NIST | -52 | 6 | Aug 00 |
| CSIR-NML | -57 | 40 | Sep 00 |
| SP | -47 | 9 | Oct 00 |
| NIST | -57 | 6 | Nov 00 |
The results of mesurements obtained by the participants in EURAMET.EM-K5 are given in Table 2 p. 5 of the Final Report.
The results of mesurements obtained by participants in EUROMET.EM-K5.1 are given in Table 2 on page 7 of the EUROMET.EM-K5.1 Final Report.
The results of mesurements obtained by the participants in SIM.EM-K5 are given in Tables B.1 to B.8 on pages 29 to 36 of the Final Report.
The results of mesurements obtained by the participants in COOMET.EM-K5 are given in Table 8 on pages 20 to 22 of the Final Report.
