CCEM-K5, EUROMET.EM-K5, EUROMET.EM-K5.1 and SIM.EM-K5

MEASURAND: Electric power at 120 V, 5 A, 53 Hz, power factor 1.0
NOMINAL VALUE: 600 VA, 600 W

Degrees of equivalence: Di = xi - xR and expanded uncertainty Ui (k = 2),
both expressed in µW/VA

Click on the graph for a closer view

CCEM-K5, EUROMET.EM-K5, EUROMET.EM-K5.1 and SIM.EM-K5

MEASURAND: Electric power at 120 V, 5 A, 53 Hz, power factor 0.5 Lead
NOMINAL VALUE: 600 VA, 300 W

Degrees of equivalence: Di = xi - xR and expanded uncertainty Ui (k = 2),
both expressed in µW/VA

Click on the graph for a closer view

CCEM-K5, EUROMET.EM-K5, EUROMET.EM-K5.1 and SIM.EM-K5

MEASURAND: electric power at 120 V, 5 A, 53 Hz, power factor 0.5 Lag
NOMINAL VALUE: 600 VA, 300 W

Degrees of equivalence: Di = xi - xR and expanded uncertainty Ui (k = 2),
both expressed in µW/VA

Click on the graph for a closer view

CCEM-K5, EUROMET.EM-K5 and EUROMET.EM-K5.1

MEASURAND: Electric power at 120 V, 5 A, 53 Hz, power factor 0.0 Lead
NOMINAL VALUE: 600 VA, 0 W

Degrees of equivalence: Di = xi - xR and expanded uncertainty Ui (k = 2),
both expressed in µW/VA

Click on the graph for a closer view

CCEM-K5, EUROMET.EM-K5 and EUROMET.EM-K5.1

MEASURAND: electric power at 120 V, 5 A, 53 Hz, power factor 0.0 Lag
NOMINAL VALUE: 600 VA, 0 W

Degrees of equivalence: Di = xi - xR and expanded uncertainty Ui (k = 2),
both expressed in µW/VA

Click on the graph for a closer view

CCEM-K5, EUROMET.EM-K5, EUROMET.EM-K5.1 and SIM.EM-K5

MEASURAND: Electric power at 120 V, 5 A, 53 Hz, power factor 1.0
NOMINAL VALUE: 600 VA, 600 W

Degrees of equivalence: Di = xi - xR and expanded uncertainty Ui (k = 2),
both expressed in µW/VA

Black: participants in CCEM-K5
Dark blue: participants in EUROMET.EM-K5 only
Green: participants in EUROMET.EM-K5.1 only
Orange: participants in SIM.EM-K5 only

The acronym "UMTS" stands for "Ukrmetrteststandard".
The laboratories' acronyms used in this table have been updated in December 2014.

Results are presented under A4 printable format in Summary Results (PDF file).

CCEM-K5, EUROMET.EM-K5, EUROMET.EM-K5.1 and SIM.EM-K5

MEASURAND: Electric power at 120 V, 5 A, 53 Hz, power factor 0.5 Lead
NOMINAL VALUE: 600 VA, 300 W

Degrees of equivalence: Di = xi - xR and expanded uncertainty Ui (k = 2),
both expressed in µW/VA

Black: participants in CCEM-K5
Dark blue: participants in EUROMET.EM-K5 only
Green: participants in EUROMET.EM-K5.1 only
Orange: participants in SIM.EM-K5 only

The acronym "UMTS" stands for "Ukrmetrteststandard".
The laboratories' acronyms used in this table have been updated in December 2014.

Results are presented under A4 printable format in Summary Results (PDF file).

CCEM-K5, EUROMET.EM-K5, EUROMET.EM-K5.1 and SIM.EM-K5

MEASURAND: Electric power at 120 V, 5 A, 53 Hz, power factor 0.5 Lag
NOMINAL VALUE: 600 VA, 300 W

Degrees of equivalence: Di = xi - xR and expanded uncertainty Ui (k = 2),
both expressed in µW/VA

Black: participants in CCEM-K5
Dark blue: participants in EUROMET.EM-K5 only
Green: participants in EUROMET.EM-K5.1 only
Orange: participants in SIM.EM-K5 only

The acronym "UMTS" stands for "Ukrmetrteststandard".
The laboratories' acronyms used in this table have been updated in December 2014.

Results are presented under A4 printable format in Summary Results (PDF file).

CCEM-K5, EUROMET.EM-K5 and EUROMET.EM-K5.1

MEASURAND: Electric power at 120 V, 5 A, 53 Hz, power factor 0.0 Lead
NOMINAL VALUE: 600 VA, 0 W

Degrees of equivalence: Di = xi - xR and expanded uncertainty Ui (k = 2),
both expressed in µW/VA

Black: participants in CCEM-K5
Dark blue: participants in EUROMET.EM-K5 only
Green: participants in EUROMET.EM-K5.1 only

The acronym "UMTS" stands for "Ukrmetrteststandard".
The laboratories' acronyms used in this table have been updated in December 2014.

Results are presented under A4 printable format in Summary Results (PDF file).

CCEM-K5, EUROMET.EM-K5 and EUROMET.EM-K5.1

MEASURAND: Electric power at 120 V, 5 A, 53 Hz, power factor 0.0 Lag
NOMINAL VALUE: 600 VA, 0 W

Degrees of equivalence: Di = xi - xR and expanded uncertainty Ui (k = 2),
both expressed in µW/VA

Black: participants in CCEM-K5
Dark blue: participants in EUROMET.EM-K5 only
Green: participants in EUROMET.EM-K5.1 only

The acronym "UMTS" stands for "Ukrmetrteststandard".
The laboratories' acronyms used in this table have been updated in December 2014.

Results are presented under A4 printable format in Summary Results (PDF file).

Comparison
Comparison close
RMO comparison
Linked comparison
EUROMET.EM-K5
Metrology area, Sub-field Electricity and Magnetism, AC Voltage, Current, Power, and AC/DC Transfer
Description AC power at 50/60 Hz
Time of measurements 1996 - 2001
Status Approved for equivalence
Final Reports of the comparisons
Measurand AC power; 120 V, 5 A, at 53 Hz
Parameters Power factor: 1.0, 0.5 Lead, 0.5 Lag, 0.0 Lead, 0.0 Lag
Transfer device Watt converter
Comparison type Key Comparison
Consultative Committee CCEM (Consultative Committee for Electricity and Magnetism)
Conducted by EURAMET (European Association of National Metrology Institutes)
RMO Internal Identifier EUROMET Project No 385
Comments

Results published on 29 November 2006

EUROMET.EM-K5, EUROMET.EM-K5.1 and SIM.EM-K5 results are linked to those of CCEM-K5

AC power

:

Pilot institute PTB
Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt
Germany
Contact person R. Bergeest

+49 (0) 531 592 2330
First Name Last Name
wwww@ww.www +356719836 Institute 1 Institute 1 Khmelnitskiy
Pilot laboratory
PTB

Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt, Germany, EURAMET

AREPA

Arepa Test and Calibration A/S, Denmark, EURAMET

BEV

Bundesamt für Eich- und Vermessungswesen, Austria, EURAMET

CEM

Centro Español de Metrologia, Spain, EURAMET

CMI

Czech Metrology Institute, Czechia, EURAMET

GUM

Glowny Urzad Miar, Central Office of Measures, Poland, EURAMET

IEN

Istituto Elettrotecnico Nazionale Galileo Ferraris; from 1st January 2006: Istituto Nazionale di Ricerca Metrologica, INRIM, Italy, EURAMET

INETI

Instituto Nacional de Engenharia e Tecnologia Industrial (merged into IPQ), Portugal, EURAMET

JV

Justervesenet, Norway, EURAMET

METAS

Federal Institute of Metrology, Switzerland, EURAMET

MIKES

VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland Ltd, Centre for Metrology/Mittatekniikan keskus, Finland, EURAMET

NMi-VSL

Nederlands Meetinstituut - Van Swinden Laboratorium (became VSL in 2009), Netherlands, EURAMET

NPL

National Physical Laboratory, United Kingdom, EURAMET

OMH

Országos Mérésügyi Hivatal; Subsequently MKEH, now BKFH, Hungary, EURAMET

SMD

Service de la Métrologie Belge, Belgium, EURAMET

SP

Technical Research Institute of Sweden from 2017 Research Institutes of Sweden AB, Sweden, EURAMET

UME

TÜBITAK Ulusal Metroloji Enstitüsü, Türkiye, EURAMET

CCEM-K5, EUROMET.EM-K5, EUROMET.EM-K5.1 and SIM.EM-K5

MEASURAND: Electric power at 120 V, 5 A, 53 Hz, power factor 1.0
NOMINAL VALUE: 600 VA, 600 W

  • Key comparison CCEM-K5
The key comparison reference value, xR, is calculated as the weighted mean of the difference between laboratory i and the predicted value, based on measurements performed at the pilot laboratory. Its standard uncertainty, uR, is calculated as the uncertainty of the weighted mean of the differences.

xR = 7 µW/VA and uR = 5 µW/VA

The degree of equivalence of each laboratory with respect to the key comparison reference value is given by a pair of terms:
Di and Ui, its expanded uncertainty (k = 2), both expressed in µW/VA.
The derivation of these terms can be found in the CCEM-K5 Final Report.
When required, the degree of equivalence between two laboratories i and j is given by a pair of terms:
Dij and Uij, its expanded uncertainty (k = 2), both expressed in µW/VA.
The derivation of these terms can also be found in the CCEM-K5 Final Report.
  • Linking EUROMET.EM-K5 to CCEM-K5

The linkage between EUROMET.EM-K5 and CCEM-K5 is computed as explained in the EUROMET.EM-K5 Linkage Report. The INRIM, NPL, PTB and SP participated in both comparisons. The common participants at the exception of SP were used as linking laboratories as explained on page 1 of the Linkage Report.

  • Linking EUROMET.EM-K5.1 to CCEM-K5

PTB as participant in both comparisons ensures the linkage, which is computed as explained in the EUROMET.EM-K5.1 Linkage Report.

  • Linking SIM.EM-K5 to CCEM-K5

It was possible to link SIM.EM-K5 results to those of CCEM-K5 for the power factors 1.0, 0.5 Lead and 0.5 Lag as explained in the Addendum to the SIM.EM-K5 Final Report.
NIST, NRC, INTI, INMETRO and CENAM ensure the linkage.

It follows that the table of degrees of equivalence relative to the key comparison reference value and the graph of equivalence obtained for CCEM-K5 can be extended to include results from the EUROMET.EM-K5, EUROMET.EM-K5.1 and SIM.EM-K5 participants.

CCEM-K5, EUROMET.EM-K5, EUROMET.EM-K5.1 and SIM.EM-K5

MEASURAND: Electric power at 120 V, 5 A, 53 Hz, power factor 0.5 Lead
NOMINAL VALUE: 600 VA, 300 W

  • Key comparison CCEM-K5
The key comparison reference value, xR, is calculated as the weighted mean of the difference between laboratory i and the predicted value, based on measurements performed at the pilot laboratory. Its standard uncertainty, uR, is calculated as the uncertainty of the weighted mean of the differences.

xR = -1 µW/VA and uR = 5 µW/VA

The degree of equivalence of each laboratory with respect to the key comparison reference value is given by a pair of terms:
Di and Ui, its expanded uncertainty (k = 2), both expressed in µW/VA.
The derivation of these terms can be found in the CCEM-K5 Final Report.
When required, the degree of equivalence between two laboratories i and j is given by a pair of terms:
Dij and Uij, its expanded uncertainty (k = 2), both expressed in µW/VA.
The derivation of these terms can also be found in the CCEM-K5 Final Report.
  • Linking EUROMET.EM-K5 to CCEM-K5

The linkage between EUROMET.EM-K5 and CCEM-K5 is computed as explained in the EUROMET.EM-K5 Linkage Report. The INRIM, NPL, PTB and SP participated in both comparisons. The common participants at the exception of SP were used as linking laboratories as explained on page 1 of the Linkage Report.

  • Linking EUROMET.EM-K5.1 to CCEM-K5

PTB as participant in both comparisons ensures the linkage, which is computed as explained in the EUROMET.EM-K5.1 Linkage Report.

  • Linking SIM.EM-K5 to CCEM-K5

It was possible to link SIM.EM-K5 results to those of CCEM-K5 for the power factors 1.0, 0.5 Lead and 0.5 Lag as explained in the Addendum to the SIM.EM-K5 Final Report.
NIST, NRC, INTI, INMETRO and CENAM ensure the linkage.

It follows that the table of degrees of equivalence relative to the key comparison reference value and the graph of equivalence obtained for CCEM-K5 can be extended to include results from the EUROMET.EM-K5, EUROMET.EM-K5.1 and SIM.EM-K5 participants.

CCEM-K5, EUROMET.EM-K5, EUROMET.EM-K5.1 and SIM.EM-K5

MEASURAND: Electric power at 120 V, 5 A, 53 Hz, power factor 0.5 Lag
NOMINAL VALUE: 600 VA, 300 W

  • Key comparison CCEM-K5
The key comparison reference value, xR, is calculated as the weighted mean of the difference between laboratory i and the predicted value, based on measurements performed at the pilot laboratory. Its standard uncertainty, uR, is calculated as the uncertainty of the weighted mean of the differences.

xR = -1 µW/VA and uR = 5 µW/VA

The degree of equivalence of each laboratory with respect to the key comparison reference value is given by a pair of terms:
Di and Ui, its expanded uncertainty (k = 2), both expressed in µW/VA.
The derivation of these terms can be found in the CCEM-K5 Final Report.
When required, the degree of equivalence between two laboratories i and j is given by a pair of terms:
Dij and Uij, its expanded uncertainty (k = 2), both expressed in µW/VA.
The derivation of these terms can also be found in the CCEM-K5 Final Report.
  • Linking EUROMET.EM-K5 to CCEM-K5

The linkage between EUROMET.EM-K5 and CCEM-K5 is computed as explained in the EUROMET.EM-K5 Linkage Report. The INRIM, NPL, PTB and SP participated in both comparisons. The common participants at the exception of SP were used as linking laboratories as explained on page 1 of the Linkage Report.

  • Linking EUROMET.EM-K5.1 to CCEM-K5

PTB as participant in both comparisons ensures the linkage, which is computed as explained in the EUROMET.EM-K5.1 Linkage Report.

  • Linking SIM.EM-K5 to CCEM-K5

It was possible to link SIM.EM-K5 results to those of CCEM-K5 for the power factors 1.0, 0.5 Lead and 0.5 Lag as explained in the Addendum to the SIM.EM-K5 Final Report.
NIST, NRC, INTI, INMETRO and CENAM ensure the linkage.

It follows that the table of degrees of equivalence relative to the key comparison reference value and the graph of equivalence obtained for CCEM-K5 can be extended to include results from the EUROMET.EM-K5, EUROMET.EM-K5.1 and SIM.EM-K5 participants.

CCEM-K5, EUROMET.EM-K5 and EUROMET.EM-K5.1

MEASURAND: Electric power at 120 V, 5 A, 53 Hz, power factor 0.0 Lead
NOMINAL VALUE: 600 VA, 0 W

  • Key comparison CCEM-K5
The key comparison reference value, xR, is calculated as the weighted mean of the difference between laboratory i and the predicted value, based on measurements performed at the pilot laboratory. Its standard uncertainty, uR, is calculated as the uncertainty of the weighted mean of the differences.

xR = 0 µW/VA and uR = 5 µW/VA

The degree of equivalence of each laboratory with respect to the key comparison reference value is given by a pair of terms:
Di and Ui, its expanded uncertainty (k = 2), both expressed in µW/VA.
The derivation of these terms can be found in the CCEM-K5 Final Report.
When required, the degree of equivalence between two laboratories i and j is given by a pair of terms:
Dij and Uij, its expanded uncertainty (k = 2), both expressed in µW/VA.
The derivation of these terms can also be found in the CCEM-K5 Final Report.
  • Linking EUROMET.EM-K5 to CCEM-K5

The linkage between EUROMET.EM-K5 and CCEM-K5 is computed as explained in the EUROMET.EM-K5 Linkage Report. The INRIM, NPL, PTB and SP participated in both comparisons. The common participants at the exception of SP were used as linking laboratories as explained on page 1 of the Linkage Report.

  • Linking EUROMET.EM-K5.1 to CCEM-K5

PTB as participant in both comparisons ensures the linkage, which is computed as explained in the EUROMET.EM-K5.1 Linkage Report.

It follows that the table of degrees of equivalence relative to the key comparison reference value and the graph of equivalence obtained for CCEM-K5 can be extended to include results from the EUROMET.EM-K5 and EUROMET.EM-K5.1 participants.

CCEM-K5, EUROMET.EM-K5 and EUROMET.EM-K5.1

MEASURAND: electric power at 120 V, 5 A, 53 Hz, power factor 0.0 Lag
NOMINAL VALUE: 600 VA, 0 W

  • Key comparison CCEM-K5
The key comparison reference value, xR, is calculated as the weighted mean of the difference between laboratory i and the predicted value, based on measurements performed at the pilot laboratory. Its standard uncertainty, uR, is calculated as the uncertainty of the weighted mean of the differences.

xR = -3 µW/VA and uR = 5 µW/VA

The degree of equivalence of each laboratory with respect to the key comparison reference value is given by a pair of terms:
Di and Ui, its expanded uncertainty (k = 2), both expressed in µW/VA.
The derivation of these terms can be found in the CCEM-K5 Final Report.
When required, the degree of equivalence between two laboratories i and j is given by a pair of terms:
Dij and Uij, its expanded uncertainty (k = 2), both expressed in µW/VA.
The derivation of these terms can also be found in the CCEM-K5 Final Report.
  • Linking EUROMET.EM-K5 to CCEM-K5

The linkage between EUROMET.EM-K5 and CCEM-K5 is computed as explained in the EUROMET.EM-K5 Linkage Report. The INRIM, NPL, PTB and SP participated in both comparisons. The common participants at the exception of SP were used as linking laboratories as explained on page 1 of the Linkage Report.

  • Linking EUROMET.EM-K5.1 to CCEM-K5

PTB as participant in both comparisons ensures the linkage, which is computed as explained in the EUROMET.EM-K5.1 Linkage Report.

It follows that the table of degrees of equivalence relative to the key comparison reference value and the graph of equivalence obtained for CCEM-K5 can be extended to include results from the EUROMET.EM-K5 and EUROMET.EM-K5.1 participants.

CCEM-K5, EUROMET.EM-K5, EUROMET.EM-K5.1 and SIM.EM-K5

  • Key comparison CCEM-K5

MEASURAND: Electric power at 120 V, 5 A, 53 Hz, power factor 1.0
NOMINAL VALUE: 600 VA, 600 W

xi : deviation from nominal measured by laboratory i
ui : standard combined uncertainty of xi

 Lab i xi
/ (µW/VA)
ui
/ (µW/VA)
Date of measurement
 NRC 29 6 Jun 96
 NIST 26 7 Jul 96
 PTB 23 7 Aug 96
 SP -10 15 Sep 96
 NIST 27 7 Oct 96
 NMIA 31 7 Nov 96
 MSL 66 34 Dec 96
 NIST 22 7 Feb 97
 NPL 38 16 Mar 97
 INRIM 23 15 Apr 97
 NIST 21 7 May 97
 INTI 42 10 Aug 97
 NIST 22 7 Sep 97
 NIST 20 7 Nov 97
 NIM 37 6 Mar 98
 NIST 14 7 Apr 98
 VNIIM 30 9 Jun 98
 NRC 14 6 Sep 98
 NIST 9 7 Nov 98
 SPRING 38 31 Dec 98
 CSIR-NML -21 30 Feb 99
 NIST 8 7 Mar 99
 PTB 15 5 May 99
 NIST 8 7 Jun 99
 INMETRO 6 30 Aug 99
 CENAM 19 17 Aug 99
 NIST 10 7 Sep 99
 NIST 9 7 Jun 00
 NIM 20 6 Jul 00
 MSL 20 14 Aug 00
 NIST 17 7 Aug 00
 CSIR-NML 13 40 Sep 00
 SP 27 15 Oct 00
 NIST 21 7 Nov 00

  • Key comparison EUROMET.EM-K5

MEASURAND: Electric power at 120 V, 5 A, 53 Hz, power factor 1.0
NOMINAL VALUE: 600 VA, 600 W

xi-EUR: deviation from nominal measured by laboratory i
ui-EUR : combined standard uncertainty of xi-EUR

 Lab i xi-EUR
/ (µW/VA)
ui-EUR
/ (µW/VA)
Date of measurement
 PTB -61 11 Nov 96
 PTB -57 11 Feb 97
 NPL -51 16 Mar 97
 PTB -42 11 Apr 97
 INRIM -47 15 Apr 97
 PTB -59 11 May 97
 SP -79 15 Jun 97
 AREPA -49 47 Jun 97
 PTB -53 11 Jul 97
 NMi-VSL* 84 - Aug 97
 INETI -49 36 Oct 97
 SMD 9 19 Dec 97
 PTB -49 11 Dec 97
 BEV -104 35 Feb 98
 PTB -47 11 Feb 98
 METAS -59 27 Mar 98
 PTB -41 11 Mar 98
 MIKES* - - Apr 98
 PTB -35 11 May 98
 CMI -40 35 Jun 98
 OMH 0 85 Jun 98
 PTB -47 11 Jul 98
 JV -18 35 Aug 98
 PTB -54 11 Sep 98
 UME* - - Oct 98
 PTB -50 11 Nov 98
 CEM -50 33 Dec 98
 PTB -59 11 Jan 99
 GUM -26 38 Feb 99
 PTB -61 11 Feb 99
 PTB -44 11 Oct 99
 MIKES -9 17 Dec 99
 PTB -48 11 Dec 99
 NMi-VSL -30 5 Apr 00
 UME

-24

36

Nov 00

 PTB

-32

11

Mar 01

 PTB

-28

11

Apr 01

* Laboratories having discovered errors in their measurement systems and having therefore asked for repetition of their measurements. The first measurement results made by these laboratories have not been used in the final results.

  • Key comparison EUROMET.EM-K5.1

MEASURAND: Electric power at 120 V, 5 A, 53 Hz, power factor 1.0
NOMINAL VALUE: 600 VA, 600 W

The results of mesurements obtained by participants in EUROMET.EM-K5.1 are given in Table 2 on page 7 of the EUROMET.EM-K5.1 Final Report.

  • Key comparison SIM.EM-K5

MEASURAND: Electric power at 120 V, 5 A, 53 Hz, power factor 1.0
NOMINAL VALUE: 600 VA, 600 W

The results of mesurements obtained by the participants in SIM.EM-K5 are given in Tables B.1 to B.8 on pages 29 to 36 of the Final Report.

CCEM-K5, EUROMET.EM-K5, EUROMET.EM-K5.1 and SIM.EM-K5

  • Key comparison CCEM-K5

MEASURAND: Electric power at 120 V, 5 A, 53 Hz, power factor 0.5 Lead
NOMINAL VALUE: 600 VA, 300 W

xi : deviation from nominal measured by laboratory i
ui : standard combined uncertainty of xi

 Lab i xi
/ (µW/VA)
ui
/ (µW/VA)
Date of measurement
 NRC 26 6 Jun 96
 NIST 17 7 Jul 96
 PTB 9 7 Aug 96
 SP -5 11 Sep 96
 NIST 20 7 Oct 96
 NMIA 15 8 Nov 96
 MSL 27 24 Dec 96
 NIST 17 7 Feb 97
 NPL 2 13 Mar 97
 INRIM 4 15 Apr 97
 NIST 12 7 May 97
 INTI 20 17 Aug 97
 NIST 15 7 Sep 97
 NIST 12 7 Nov 97
 NIM -2 4 Mar 98
 NIST 5 7 Apr 98
 VNIIM -8 14 Jun 98
 NRC 11 6 Sep 98
 NIST 5 7 Nov 98
 SPRING 3 31 Dec 98
 CSIR-NML -6 30 Feb 99
 NIST 6 7 Mar 99
 PTB -1 5 May 99
 NIST 8 7 Jun 99
 INMETRO 21 30 Aug 99
 CENAM 4 17 Aug 99
 NIST 4 7 Sep 99
 NIST 11 7 Jun 00
 NIM 23 6 Jul 00
 MSL 16 15 Aug 00
 NIST 12 7 Aug 00
 CSIR-NML -1 40 Sep 00
 SP 6 11 Oct 00
 NIST 11 7 Nov 00

  • Key comparison EUROMET.EM-K5

MEASURAND: Electric power at 120 V, 5 A, 53 Hz, power factor 0.5 Lead
NOMINAL VALUE: 600 VA, 300 W

xi-EUR: deviation from nominal measured by laboratory i
ui-EUR : combined standard uncertainty of xi-EUR

 Lab i xi-EUR
/ (µW/VA)
ui-EUR
/ (µW/VA)
Date of measurement
 PTB -23 10 Nov 96
 PTB -21 10 Feb 97
 NPL -22 14 Mar 97
 PTB -12 10 Apr 97
 INRIM -11 15 Apr 97
 PTB -24 10 May 97
 SP -30 10 Jun 97
 AREPA -38 50 Jun 97
 PTB -21 10 Jul 97
 NMi-VSL* 15 - Aug 97
 INETI -26 76 Oct 97
 SMD 4 19 Dec 97
 PTB -17 10 Dec 97
 BEV -34 35 Feb 98
 PTB -16 10 Feb 98
 METAS -3 24 Mar 98
 PTB -15 10 Mar 98
 MIKES* - - Apr 98
 PTB -10 10 May 98
 CMI -35 30 Jun 98
 OMH -35 85 Jun 98
 PTB -14 10 Jul 98
 JV -2 35 Aug 98
 PTB -15 10 Sep 98
 UME* - - Oct 98
 PTB -18 10 Nov 98
 CEM -68 33 Dec 98
 PTB -20 10 Jan 99
 GUM -9 37 Feb 99
 PTB -20 10 Feb 99
 PTB -17 10 Oct 99
 MIKES -8 10 Dec 99
 PTB -17 10 Dec 99
 NMi-VSL -30 25 Apr 00
 UME

29

36

Nov 00

 PTB

-9

10

Mar 01

 PTB

4

10

Apr 01

* Laboratories having discovered errors in their measurement systems and having therefore asked for repetition of their measurements. The first measurement results made by these laboratories have not been used in the final results.

  • Key comparison EUROMET.EM-K5.1

MEASURAND: Electric power at 120 V, 5 A, 53 Hz, power factor 0.5 Lead
NOMINAL VALUE: 600 VA, 300 W

The results of mesurements obtained by participants in EUROMET.EM-K5.1 are given in Table 2 on page 7 of the EUROMET.EM-K5.1 Final Report.

  • Key comparison SIM.EM-K5

MEASURAND: Electric power at 120 V, 5 A, 53 Hz, power factor 1.0
NOMINAL VALUE: 600 VA, 600 W

The results of mesurements obtained by the participants in SIM.EM-K5 are given in Tables B.1 to B.8 on pages 29 to 36 of the Final Report.

CCEM-K5, EUROMET.EM-K5, EUROMET.EM-K5.1 and SIM.EM-K5

  • Key comparison CCEM-K5

MEASURAND: Electric power at 120 V, 5 A, 53 Hz, power factor 0.5 Lag
NOMINAL VALUE: 600 VA, 300 W

xi : deviation from nominal measured by laboratory i
ui : standard combined uncertainty of xi

 Lab i xi
/ (µW/VA)
ui
/ (µW/VA)
Date of measurement
 NRC -27 6 Jun 96
 NIST -24 7 Jul 96
 PTB -18 7 Aug 96
 SP -43 11 Sep 96
 NIST -22 7 Oct 96
 NMIA -20 8 Nov 96
 MSL -4 24 Dec 96
 NIST -25 7 Feb 97
 NPL -4 13 Mar 97
 INRIM -21 15 Apr 97
 NIST -20 7 May 97
 INTI -20 17 Aug 97
 NIST -21 7 Sep 97
 NIST -26 7 Nov 97
 NIM 1 4 Mar 98
 NIST -27 7 Apr 98
 VNIIM -53 14 Jun 98
 NRC -37 6 Sep 98
 NIST -30 7 Nov 98
 SPRING -17 31 Dec 98
 CSIR-NML -45 30 Feb 99
 NIST -32 7 Mar 99
 PTB -18 5 May 99
 NIST -34 7 Jun 99
 INMETRO -56 30 Aug 99
 CENAM -28 17 Aug 99
 NIST -30 7 Sep 99
 NIST -28 7 Jun 00
 NIM -36 6 Jul 00
 MSL -37 15 Aug 00
 NIST -21 7 Aug 00
 CSIR-NML -14 40 Sep 00
 SP -14 11 Oct 00
 NIST -22 7 Nov 00

  • Key comparison EUROMET.EM-K5

MEASURAND: Electric power at 120 V, 5 A, 53 Hz, power factor 0.5 Lag
NOMINAL VALUE: 600 VA, 300 W

xi-EUR: deviation from nominal measured by laboratory i
ui-EUR : combined standard uncertainty of xi-EUR

 Lab i xi-EUR
/ (µW/VA)
ui-EUR
/ (µW/VA)
Date of measurement
 PTB -40 10 Nov 96
 PTB -42 10 Feb 97
 NPL -30 14 Mar 97
 PTB -33 10 Apr 97
 INRIM -37 15 Apr 97
 PTB -43 10 May 97
 SP -54 10 Jun 97
 AREPA -35 50 Jun 97
 PTB -43 10 Jul 97
 NMi-VSL* -5 - Aug 97
 INETI -30 97 Oct 97
 SMD 1 19 Dec 97
 PTB -39 10 Dec 97
 BEV -45 35 Feb 98
 PTB -38 10 Feb 98
 METAS -52 24 Mar 98
 PTB -35 10 Mar 98
 MIKES* - - Apr 98
 PTB

-33

10 May 98
 CMI -50 30 Jun 98
 OMH 28 85 Jun 98
 PTB -37 10 Jul 98
 JV -12 35 Aug 98
 PTB -39 10 Sep 98
 UME* - - Oct 98
 PTB -35 10 Nov 98
 CEM 36 33 Dec 98
 PTB -41 10 Jan 99
 GUM -23 37 Feb 99
 PTB -45 10 Feb 99
 PTB -28 10 Oct 99
 MIKES -7 10 Dec 99
 PTB -28 10 Dec 99
 NMi-VSL -5 25 Apr 00
 UME

-55

36

Nov 00

 PTB

-18

10

Mar 01

 PTB

-12

10

Apr 01

* Laboratories having discovered errors in their measurement systems and having therefore asked for repetition of their measurements. The first measurement results made by these laboratories have not been used in the final results.

  • Key comparison EUROMET.EM-K5.1

MEASURAND: Electric power at 120 V, 5 A, 53 Hz, power factor 0.5 Lag
NOMINAL VALUE: 600 VA, 300 W

The results of mesurements obtained by participants in EUROMET.EM-K5.1 are given in Table 2 on page 7 of the EUROMET.EM-K5.1 Final Report.

  • Key comparison SIM.EM-K5

MEASURAND: Electric power at 120 V, 5 A, 53 Hz, power factor 1.0
NOMINAL VALUE: 600 VA, 600 W

The results of mesurements obtained by the participants in SIM.EM-K5 are given in Tables B.1 to B.8 on pages 29 to 36 of the Final Report.

CCEM-K5, EUROMET.EM-K5 and EUROMET.EM-K5.1

  • Key comparison CCEM-K5

MEASURAND: Electric power at 120 V, 5 A, 53 Hz, power factor 0.0 Lead
NOMINAL VALUE: 600 VA, 0 W

xi : deviation from nominal measured by laboratory i
ui : standard combined uncertainty of xi

 Lab i xi
/ (µW/VA)
ui
/ (µW/VA)
Date of measurement
 NRC -7 5 Jun 96
 NIST -13 6 Jul 96
 PTB -20 6 Aug 96
 SP -18 9 Sep 96
 NIST -7 6 Oct 96
 NMIA -3 7 Nov 96
 MSL -12 18 Dec 96
 NIST -14 6 Feb 97
 NPL -41 14 Mar 97
 INRIM -27 15 Apr 97
 NIST -16 6 May 97
 INTI -9 19 Aug 97
 NIST -13 6 Sep 97
 NIST -13 6 Nov 97
 NIM -40 5 Mar 98
 NIST -20 6 Apr 98
 VNIIM -8 12 Jun 98
 NRC -15 5 Sep 98
 NIST -17 6 Nov 98
 SPRING -36 31 Dec 98
 CSIR-NML -32 30 Feb 99
 NIST -18 6 Mar 99
 PTB -22 5 May 99
 NIST -18 6 Jun 99
 INMETRO -14 30 Aug 99
 CENAM -34 27 Aug 99
 NIST -23 6 Sep 99
 NIST -15 6 Jun 00
 NIM -14 6 Jul 00
 MSL -18 16 Aug 00
 NIST -12 6 Aug 00
 CSIR-NML -43 40 Sep 00
 SP -25 9 Oct 00
 NIST -21 6 Nov 00

  • Key comparison EUROMET.EM-K5

MEASURAND: Electric power at 120 V, 5 A, 53 Hz, power factor 0.0 Lead
NOMINAL VALUE: 600 VA, 0 W

xi-EUR: deviation from nominal measured by laboratory i
ui-EUR : combined standard uncertainty of xi-EUR

 Lab i xi-EUR
/ (µW/VA)
ui-EUR
/ (µW/VA)
Date of measurement
 PTB 13 10 Nov 96
 PTB 12 10 Feb 97
 NPL 5 14 Mar 97
 PTB 13 10 Apr 97
 INRIM 21 15 Apr 97
 PTB 9 10 May 97
 SP 18 8 Jun 97
 AREPA -13 70 Jun 97
 PTB 5 10 Jul 97
 NMi-VSL* -120 - Aug 97
 INETI -208 241 Oct 97
 SMD 17 14 Dec 97
 PTB 10 10 Dec 97
 BEV 11 110 Feb 98
 PTB 9 10 Feb 98
 METAS 31 23 Mar 98
 PTB 7 10 Mar 98
 MIKES* - - Apr 98
 PTB

8

10 May 98
 CMI -50 25 Jun 98
 OMH 45 85 Jun 98
 PTB 14 10 Jul 98
 JV 6 35 Aug 98
 PTB 13 10 Sep 98
 UME* - - Oct 98
 PTB 10 10 Nov 98
 CEM - - Dec 98
 PTB 12 10 Jan 99
 GUM 16 37 Feb 99
 PTB 12 10 Feb 99
 PTB 8 10 Oct 99
 MIKES -3 6 Dec 99
 PTB 8 10 Dec 99
 NMi-VSL -10 85 Apr 00
 UME

10

36

Nov 00

 PTB

16

10

Mar 01

 PTB

20

10

Apr 01

* Laboratories having discovered errors in their measurement systems and having therefore asked for repetition of their measurements. The first measurement results made by these laboratories have not been used in the final results.

  • Key comparison EUROMET.EM-K5.1

MEASURAND: Electric power at 120 V, 5 A, 53 Hz, power factor 0.0 Lead
NOMINAL VALUE: 600 VA, 0 W

The results of mesurements obtained by participants in EUROMET.EM-K5.1 are given in Table 2 on page 7 of the EUROMET.EM-K5.1 Final Report.

CCEM-K5, EUROMET.EM-K5 and EUROMET.EM-K5.1

  • Key comparison CCEM-K5

MEASURAND: Electric power at 120 V, 5 A, 53 Hz, power factor 0.0 Lag
NOMINAL VALUE: 600 VA, 0 W

xi : deviation from nominal measured by laboratory i
ui : standard combined uncertainty of xi

 Lab i xi
/ (µW/VA)
ui
/ (µW/VA)
Date of measurement
 NRC -68 5 Jun 96
 NIST -59 6 Jul 96
 PTB -53 6 Aug 96
 SP -60 9 Sep 96
 NIST -63 6 Oct 96
 NMIA -62 7 Nov 96
 MSL -73 18 Dec 96
 NIST -54 6 Feb 97
 NPL -44 14 Mar 97
 INRIM -58 16 Apr 97
 NIST -52 6 May 97
 INTI -50 19 Aug 97
 NIST -53 6 Sep 97
 NIST -55 6 Nov 97
 NIM -37 4 Mar 98
 NIST -55 6 Apr 98
 VNIIM -70 12 Jun 98
 NRC -73 5 Sep 98
 NIST -57 6 Nov 98
 SPRING -65 31 Dec 98
 CSIR-NML -54 30 Feb 99
 NIST -58 6 Mar 99
 PTB -56 5 May 99
 NIST -59 6 Jun 99
 INMETRO -77 30 Aug 99
 CENAM -55 27 Aug 99
 NIST -60 6 Sep 99
 NIST -54 6 Jun 00
 NIM -72 6 Jul 00
 MSL -69 16 Aug 00
 NIST -52 6 Aug 00
 CSIR-NML -57 40 Sep 00
 SP -47 9 Oct 00
 NIST -57 6 Nov 00

  • Key comparison EUROMET.EM-K5

MEASURAND: Electric power at 120 V, 5 A, 53 Hz, power factor 0.0 Lag
NOMINAL VALUE: 600 VA, 0 W

xi-EUR: deviation from nominal measured by laboratory i
ui-EUR : combined standard uncertainty of xi-EUR

 Lab i xi-EUR
/ (µW/VA)
ui-EUR
/ (µW/VA)
Date of measurement
 PTB -8 10 Nov 96
 PTB -12 10 Feb 97
 NPL -3 14 Mar 97
 PTB -10 10 Apr 97
 INRIM -10 15 Apr 97
 PTB -14 10 May 97
 SP -13 8 Jun 97
 AREPA -14 70 Jun 97
 PTB 20 10 Jul 97
 NMi-VSL* 15 - Aug 97
 INETI 4 148 Oct 97
 SMD 9 14 Dec 97
 PTB -17 10 Dec 97
 BEV -3 110 Feb 98
 PTB -19 10 Feb 98
 METAS -24 23 Mar 98
 PTB -16 10 Mar 98
 MIKES* - - Apr 98
 PTB

-14

10 May 98
 CMI -130 25 Jun 98
 OMH -37 85 Jun 98
 PTB -14 10 Jul 98
 JV -13 35 Aug 98
 PTB -13 10 Sep 98
 UME* - - Oct 98
 PTB -10 10 Nov 98
 CEM - - Dec 98
 PTB -8 10 Jan 99
 GUM 7 37 Feb 99
 PTB -8 10 Feb 99
 PTB 2 10 Oct 99
 MIKES -1 6 Dec 99
 PTB -1 10 Dec 99
 NMi-VSL 12 85 Apr 00
 UME

-15

36

Nov 00

 PTB

12

10

Mar 01

 PTB

16

10

Apr 01

* Laboratories having discovered errors in their measurement systems and having therefore asked for repetition of their measurements. The first measurement results made by these laboratories have not been used in the final results.

  • Key comparison EUROMET.EM-K5.1

MEASURAND: Electric power at 120 V, 5 A, 53 Hz, power factor 0.0 Lag
NOMINAL VALUE: 600 VA, 0 W

The results of mesurements obtained by participants in EUROMET.EM-K5.1 are given in Table 2 on page 7 of the EUROMET.EM-K5.1 Final Report.