Comparison
Comparison close
Results

MEASURANDS : Distances of the centres of the front and back faces of the individual gauges of the step-gauge with respect of the centre of the front face of the first gauge

TRAVELLING STANDARD : A 420 mm long step-gauge with 11 gauges, designated as Gauge 1 to Gauge 11

Graphs of equivalence are built up for Gauges 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 9 and 11 only.

DVNIIM = -12.48 µm and UVNIIM = 1.55 µm

DVNIIM = -10.71 µm and UVNIIM = 1.56 µm

DVNIIM = 12.31 µm and UVNIIM = 1.58 µm

DVNIIM = 13.15 µm and UVNIIM = 1.60 µm

DVNIIM = 7.22 µm and UVNIIM = 1.61 µm

DVNIIM = 7.48 µm and UVNIIM = 1.63 µm

DVNIIM = 3.18 µm and UVNIIM = 1.83 µm

Comparison
Comparison close
Results

MEASURANDS : Distances of the centres of the front and back faces of the individual gauges of the step-gauge with respect of the centre of the front face of the first gauge

TRAVELLING STANDARD : A 420 mm long step-gauge with 11 gauges, designated as Gauge 1 to Gauge 11

Degrees of equivalence relative to the key comparison reference values are computed for Gauges 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 9 and 11 only.

Unless otherwise stated, in the final numbers presented here, rounding has been applied according to ISO-31-0 Annex B Rule B.

Results are presented under A4 printable format in Summary Results (PDF file).

Comparison
Comparison close
RMO comparison
Linked comparison
EUROMET.L-K5.2004
Metrology area, Sub-field Length, Dimensional Metrology
Description Step gauge
Time of measurements 2004 - 2007
Status Approved for equivalence
Final Reports of the comparisons
References

EUROMET.L-K5.2004 Technical Protocol

Measurand Length: 420 mm
Transfer device Step gauge
Comparison type Key Comparison
Consultative Committee CCL (Consultative Committee for Length )
Conducted by EURAMET (European Association of National Metrology Institutes)
RMO Internal Identifier EUROMET Project No 777
Comments

 

 

Results published on 27 March 2012

Step gauge

 

 

Pilot institute CEM
Centro Español de Metrologia
Spain
Contact person Emilio PRIETO

+34 91 807 4716
First Name Last Name
wwww@ww.www +356719836 Institute 1 Institute 1 Khmelnitskiy
Pilot laboratory
CEM

Centro Español de Metrologia, Spain, EURAMET

BEV

Bundesamt für Eich- und Vermessungswesen, Austria, EURAMET

CENAM

Centro Nacional de Metrologia, Mexico, SIM

CMI

Czech Metrology Institute, Czechia, EURAMET

DTU

Technical University of Denmark, Denmark, EURAMET

GUM

Glowny Urzad Miar, Central Office of Measures, Poland, EURAMET

INM

National Institute of Metrology, Romania, EURAMET

INMETRO

Instituto Nacional de Metrologia, Qualidade e Tecnologia, Brazil, SIM

INRIM

Istituto Nazionale di Ricerca Metrologica, Italy, EURAMET

LNE

Laboratoire national de métrologie et d'essais, France, EURAMET

MIKES

VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland Ltd, Centre for Metrology/Mittatekniikan keskus, Finland, EURAMET

NMIA

National Measurement Institute, Australia, Australia, APMP

NPL

National Physical Laboratory, United Kingdom, EURAMET

NRC

National Research Council, Canada, SIM

NSAI NML

NSAI National Metrology Laboratory, Ireland, EURAMET

VNIIM

D.I. Mendeleyev Institute for Metrology, Rosstandart, Russian Federation, COOMET

VSL

VSL, Netherlands, EURAMET

Comparison
Comparison close
Results

MEASURANDS : Distances of the centres of the front and back faces of the individual gauges of the step-gauge with respect of the centre of the front face of the first gauge

TRAVELLING STANDARD : A 420 mm long step-gauge with 11 gauges, designated as Gauge 1 to Gauge 11

For Gauges 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 9 and 11, the key comparison reference value, xR, is obtained as the weighted average of the participant results, with exclusion of outliers (see Section 9 of the Final Report for the equations and the list of excluded values).
Its standard uncertainty, xR, is computed as explained in Section 9.2 of the Final Report.

The linkage of the results of CENAM and CEM4 to those of the main group is explained in Section 10 of the Final Report.

In each case, the degree of equivalence of laboratory i relative to the key comparison reference value is given by a pair of terms: the deviation Di of the laboratory measurement to the reference value and the expanded uncertainty (k = 2) Ui of this deviation.

In each case, the degree of equivalence between laboratories i and j is given by a pair of terms: Dij = Di - Dj and associated expanded uncertainty (k = 2) Uij, computed as twice the root mean square of the individual standard uncertainties of the two laboratories.
The pair-wise degrees of equivalence are not reported here, but can be found on pages 71 to 83 of the Final Report.
Comparison
Comparison close
Results

MEASURANDS : Distances of the centres of the front and back faces of the individual gauges of the step-gauge with respect of the centre of the front face of the first gauge

TRAVELLING STANDARD : A 420 mm long step-gauge with 11 gauges, designated as Gauge 1 to Gauge 11

Measurement results, as reported by participants, and corresponding measurement uncertainties are given in Sections 6 and 7 on pages 19, 20 and 21 of the Final Report, and also summarized in Section 9.5 on page 43 of the same Report.

IPQ and NMISA resigned to measure for technical reasons.

CEM carried out four measurements designated as CEM1, CEM2, CEM3 and CEM4.
Only CEM2 and CEM4 are retained in the following, CEM1 and CEM3 having been used to assess the stability of the travelling standard, and for other purposes.

Looking at the evolution of the measured values along the time, the following actions were taken:
1. To exclude Gauges 5, 7, 8 and 10 from calculation, based on the large variations and anomalous behaviour observed on them by the Pilot Laboratory and the participants.
2. Assume that only Gauges 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 9 and 11 are reasonably stable along the comparison and use them for the analysis. Although there is a reduction in the number of the gauges, the number of remaining ones is still valid for checking the capability of participants to calibrate step gauges according to their CMCs.
3. To leave out the results of CENAM and CEM4 and analyze them separately, as a secong group, linking later their results to the main group.