Comparison
Comparison close
Results
Comparison
Comparison close
Results
Comparison
Comparison close
RMO comparison
Linked comparison
EURAMET.M.FF-S2
Metrology area, Sub-field Mass and related quantities, Fluid Flow
Description Comparison of water flow calibration
Time of measurements 2008 - 2009
Status Approved
Final Reports of the comparisons
Measurand Volumetric flow rate: 1 m3/h, 2.5 m3/h, 5 m3/h, 7.5 m3/h and 10 m3/h
Parameters Temperature: ~ 20 °C
Transfer device Two electromagnetic flowmeters
Comparison type Supplementary Comparison
Consultative Committee CCM (Consultative Committee for Mass and Related Quantities)
Conducted by EURAMET (European Association of National Metrology Institutes)
RMO Internal Identifier EURAMET Project No 1046
Comments

Pilot institute CMI
Czech Metrology Institute
Czechia
Contact person J. Gersl

+420 545 555 289
First Name Last Name
wwww@ww.www +356719836 Institute 1 Institute 1 Khmelnitskiy
Pilot laboratory
CMI

Czech Metrology Institute, Czechia, EURAMET

BEV

Bundesamt für Eich- und Vermessungswesen, Austria, EURAMET

BOM

Bureau of Metrology, Ministry of Economy (North Macedonia), North Macedonia, EURAMET

EIM

Hellenic Institute of Metrology, Greece, EURAMET

IMBIH

Institute of Metrology of Bosnia and Herzegovina, Bosnia and Herzegovina, EURAMET

JV

Justervesenet, Norway, EURAMET

LNE-CETIAT

Centre Technique des Industries Aérauliques et Thermiques, France, EURAMET

METAS

Federal Institute of Metrology, Switzerland, EURAMET

SMU

Slovensky Metrologicky Ustav, Slovakia, EURAMET

Comparison
Comparison close
Results
Comparison
Comparison close
Results