CCM.F-K2.a, CCM.F-K2.b, EUROMET.M.F-K2, CCM.F-K2.a.1, APMP.M.F-K2.a, APMP.M.F-K2.b, APMP.M.F-K2.1 and CCM.F-K2.a.2
MEASURAND Force
NOMINAL VALUE 50 kN
Degrees of equivalence represented by Di = (xi - xR) and its expanded uncertainty Ui at a 95 % level of confidence, both expressed in 10-5.
Enlarged graph
CCM.F-K2.a, CCM.F-K2.b, EUROMET.M.F-K2, CCM.F-K2.a.1, APMP.M.F-K2.a, APMP.M.F-K2.b, APMP.M.F-K2.1 and CCM.F-K2.a.2
MEASURAND Force
NOMINAL VALUE 100 kN
Degrees of equivalence represented by Di = (xi - xR) and its expanded uncertainty Ui at a 95 % level of confidence, both expressed in 10-5.
Enlarged graph
CCM.F-K2.a, CCM.F-K2.b, EUROMET.M.F-K2, CCM.F-K2.a.1, APMP.M.F-K2.a, APMP.M.F-K2.b, APMP.M.F-K2.1 and CCM.F-K2.a.2
MEASURAND Force
NOMINAL VALUE 50 kN
Degrees of equivalence represented by Di = (xi - xR) and its expanded uncertainty Ui at a 95 % level of confidence, both expressed in 10-5.
| LABi | Di | Uneg,i | Upos,i | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
×10-5 |
×10-5 |
×10-5 |
||
| NPL | -0.5 | 1.6 | ||
| NMISA | 1.1 | 60.0 | ||
| LNE | -0.7 | 1.8 | ||
| NMIJ | -1.7 | 2.0 | ||
| KRISS | 0.8 | 2.4 | ||
| NIM | 0.8 | 2.4 | ||
| UME | -4.5 | 2.5 | ||
| PTB | -1.1 | 2.6 | ||
| SMD | 7.9 | 5.2 | ||
| RISE | 4.0 | 5.4 | ||
| NIST | 2.4 | 2.0 | ||
| INRIM | 3.6 | 2.7 | ||
| CENAM | -2.8 | 4.3 | ||
| MIKES | 0.0 | 5.2 | ||
| VSL | -10.3 | 10.3 | ||
| METAS | -1.0 | 3.3 | ||
| BFKH | 4.4 | 20.2 | ||
| CMI | 0.4 | 20.2 | ||
| IPQ | -0.2 | 3.4 | ||
| INM | -0.8 | 5.6 | ||
| EIM | 0.6 | 3.1 | ||
| FORCE | -3.6 | 10.4 | ||
| INMETRO | -0.9 | 3.3 | ||
| GUM | 1.9 | 10.3 | ||
| INTI | -1.5 | 10.2 | ||
| CEM | -6.1 | 2.7 | ||
| NMIM | -2.6 | 4.2 | ||
| NIS | -16.6 | 3.1 | ||
| NPLI | 0.3 | 3.0 | ||
| NMC, A*STAR | -4.7 | 6.4 | ||
| SCL | -1.6 | 4.8 | ||
| VMI-STAMEQ | 25.4 | 50.1 | ||
| CMS | -3.7 | 30.5 | ||
| NIMT | -1.5 | 3.7 | ||
| SNSU-BSN | 0.4 | 10.4 | ||
| KEBS | 22.1 | 50.5 | ||
| VMI-STAMEQ | 1.0 | 4.7 | ||
| SASO-NMCC | 4.0 | 4.7 | ||
| PTB | -0.5 | 1.1 |
CCM.F-K2.a, CCM.F-K2.b, EUROMET.M.F-K2, CCM.F-K2.a.1, APMP.M.F-K2.a, APMP.M.F-K2.b, APMP.M.F-K2.1 and CCM.F-K2.a.2
MEASURAND Force
NOMINAL VALUE 100 kN
Degrees of equivalence represented by Di = (xi - xR) and its expanded uncertainty Ui at a 95 % level of confidence, both expressed in 10-5.
| LABi | Di | Uneg,i | Upos,i | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
×10-5 |
×10-5 |
×10-5 |
||
| NPL | -0.5 | 1.7 | ||
| KRISS | 1.4 | 2.7 | ||
| NIM | 0.2 | 2.3 | ||
| UME | -4.0 | 2.6 | ||
| PTB | -1.4 | 2.6 | ||
| SMD | 3.6 | 5.2 | ||
| RISE | 4.7 | 5.5 | ||
| NIST | 2.1 | 2.1 | ||
| INRIM | 3.2 | 2.7 | ||
| CENAM | 1.1 | 3.1 | ||
| MIKES | -0.2 | 5.2 | ||
| VSL | -9.4 | 10.3 | ||
| METAS | -0.7 | 3.2 | ||
| BFKH | 2.5 | 20.2 | ||
| CMI | 1.1 | 20.2 | ||
| IPQ | -0.7 | 3.3 | ||
| INM | -1.1 | 5.6 | ||
| EIM | 0.1 | 3.1 | ||
| FORCE | 1.2 | 10.4 | ||
| INMETRO | -0.9 | 3.3 | ||
| INTI | -1.9 | 10.2 | ||
| CEM | -4.7 | 2.8 | ||
| NPLI | -1.4 | 4.0 | ||
| NMC, A* STAR | -13.3 | 20.9 | ||
| SCL | -24.2 | 20.9 | ||
| VMI-STAMEQ | -31.9 | 49.9 | ||
| CMS | -2.5 | 30.2 | ||
| NIMT | -1.2 | 4.1 | ||
| SNSU-BSN | -3.0 | 10.5 | ||
| KEBS | 18.7 | 50.1 | ||
| NMIJ | 0.6 | 4.1 | ||
| VMI-STAMEQ | 0.6 | 5.4 | ||
| SASO-NMCC | 3.0 | 5.1 | ||
| PTB | -0.7 | 1.3 |
| Metrology area, Sub-field | Mass and related quantities, Force |
| Description | Medium force measurements |
| Time of measurements | 2004 - 2007 |
| Status | Approved for equivalence |
| Final Reports of the comparisons | |
| Measurand | Force: 50 kN |
| Transfer device | Force transducer |
| Comparison type | Key Comparison |
| Consultative Committee | CCM (Consultative Committee for Mass and Related Quantities) |
| Conducted by | CCM (Consultative Committee for Mass and Related Quantities) |
| Comments | Results published 23 March 2012 |
| Pilot institute |
NPL
National Physical Laboratory United Kingdom |
| Contact person | A. Knott +44 (0) 20 8943 6180 |
| Pilot laboratory | |
|---|---|
| NPL |
National Physical Laboratory, United Kingdom, EURAMET |
| KRISS |
Korea Research Institute of Standards and Science, Korea, Republic of, APMP |
| LNE |
Laboratoire national de métrologie et d'essais, France, EURAMET |
| NMIJ AIST |
National Metrology Institute of Japan, Japan, APMP |
| NMISA |
National Metrology Institute of South Africa, South Africa, AFRIMETS |
This page proposes print-out on A4 paper (portrait) of the comparison details (best printed out using a black and white printer).
Please, select items to be printed out, then click on "OK" :
CCM.F-K2.a, CCM.F-K2.b, EUROMET.M.F-K2, CCM.F-K2.a.1, APMP.M.F-K2.a, APMP.M.F-K2.b, APMP.M.F-K2.1 and CCM.F-K2.a.2
MEASURAND Force
NOMINAL VALUE 50 kN
The key comparison reference value, xR, is calculated as the weighted average of the mean relative deviations from the pilot laboratory obtained by the participating laboratories. Its standard uncertainty, uR, is calculated as explained on page 30 of the CCM.F-K2.a and CCM.F-K2.b Final Report.
xR = 0.47 × 10-5 uR = 0.33 × 10-5
The degree of equivalence of laboratory i relative to the key comparison reference value xR is given by a pair of terms, both expressed in × 10-5:
Di = (xi - xR) and its expanded uncertainty Ui at a 95 % level of confidence calculated as the sum in quadrature of the uncertainty associated with the deviation from the pilot value and the uncertainty of the KCRV (see page 32 of the CCM.F-K2.a and CCM.F-K2.b Final Report .
Linking EUROMET.M.F-K2 to CCM.F-K2
NPL and PTB provided the link between the key comparison CCM.F-K2 (.a and .b) and EUROMET.M.F-K2, having participated in both comparisons. The linking process is described in page 27 of the EUROMET.M.F-K2 Final report.
Linking CCM.F-K2.a.1 to CCM.F-K2
NPL provided the link between the key comparison CCM.F-K2.a and CCM.F-K2.a.1, having participated in both comparisons. The linking process is described in page 15 of the CCM.F-K2.a.1 Final report.
Linking APMP.M.F-K2 (.a and .b) to CCM.F-K2
KRISS, NIM and NMIJ provided the link between the key comparison CCM.F-K2 (.a and .b) and APMP.M.F-K2 (.a and .b) having participated in both comparisons. The linking process is described in Section 9 of the APMP.M.F-K2 (.a and .b) Final report.
Linking APMP.M.F-K2.1 to CCM.F-K2
KRISS provided the link between the key comparison CCM.F-K2.a and APMP.M.F-K2.1 having participated in both comparisons. The linking process is described in Section 2.6 of the APMP.M.F-K2.1 Final report.
Linking CCM.F-K2.a.2 to CCM.F-K2
NPL provided the link between the key comparison CCM.F-K2.a and CCM.F-K2.a.2, having participated in both comparisons. The linking process is described in page 11 of the CCM.F-K2.a.2 Final report.
CCM.F-K2.a, CCM.F-K2.b, EUROMET.M.F-K2, CCM.F-K2.a.1, APMP.M.F-K2.a, APMP.M.F-K2.b, APMP.M.F-K2.1 and CCM.F-K2.a.2
MEASURAND Force
NOMINAL VALUE 100 kN
The key comparison reference value, xR, is calculated as the weighted average of the mean relative deviations from the pilot laboratory obtained by the participating laboratories. Its standard uncertainty, uR, is calculated as explained on page 30 of the CCM.F-K2.a and CCM.F-K2.b Final Report.
xR = 0.52 × 10-5 uR = 0.41 × 10-5
The degree of equivalence of laboratory i relative to the key comparison reference value xR is given by a pair of terms, both expressed in × 10-5:
Di = (xi - xR) and its expanded uncertainty Ui at a 95 % level of confidence calculated as the sum in quadrature of the uncertainty associated with the deviation from the pilot value and the uncertainty of the KCRV (see page 32 of the CCM.F-K2.a and CCM.F-K2.b Final Report .
Linking EUROMET.M.F-K2 to CCM.F-K2
NPL and PTB provided the link between the key comparison CCM.F-K2 (.a and .b) and EUROMET.M.F-K2, having participated in both comparisons. The linking process is described in page 27 of the EUROMET.M.F-K2 Final report.
Linking CCM.F-K2.a.1 to CCM.F-K2
NPL provided the link between the key comparison CCM.F-K2.a and CCM.F-K2.a.1, having participated in both comparisons. The linking process is described in page 15 of the CCM.F-K2.a.1 Final report.
Linking APMP.M.F-K2 (.a and .b) to CCM.F-K2
KRISS and NIM provided the link between the key comparison CCM.F-K2 (.a and .b) and APMP.M.F-K2 (.a and .b) having participated in both comparisons. The linking process is described in Section 9 of the APMP.M.F-K2 (.a and .b) Final report.
Linking APMP.M.F-K2.1 to CCM.F-K2
KRISS provided the link between the key comparison CCM.F-K2.a and APMP.M.F-K2.1 having participated in both comparisons. The linking process is described in Section 2.6 of the APMP.M.F-K2.1 Final report.
Linking CCM.F-K2.a.2 to CCM.F-K2
NPL provided the link between the key comparison CCM.F-K2.a and CCM.F-K2.a.2, having participated in both comparisons. The linking process is described in page 11 of the CCM.F-K2.a.2 Final report.
CCM.F-K2.a, CCM.F-K2.b, EUROMET.M.F-K2, CCM.F-K2.a.1, APMP.M.F-K2.a, APMP.M.F-K2.b, APMP.M.F-K2.1 and CCM.F-K2.a.2
MEASURAND Force
NOMINAL VALUE 50 kN
CCM.F-K2.a and CCM.F-K2.b
Measurements in key comparisons CCM.F-K2.a and CCM.F-K2.b correspond to the schemes A and B respectively, as explained on page 4 of the CCM.F-K2 (a and b) Final Report. Two transducers are used in scheme A, and three transducers are used in scheme B:
- in scheme A, the two transducers have a nominal capacity of 100 kN and are used to measure 50 kN and 100 kN forces;
- in scheme B, two transducers have a nominal capacity of 50 kN and are used to measure 50 kN forces, and one transducer has a nominal capacity of 100 kN and is used to measure 50 kN forces.
Detailed results of measurements obtained in both key comparisons are given in Section 9 on page 18 of the Final Report. They are then concatenated (see page 30 of the Final Report) in order to provide one set of measurements for 50 kN forces and one set of measurements for 100 kN forces. These two sets of results are shown in Figure 26 and Figure 27 on page 31 of the Final Report.
Date of measurements: 2004 - 2007
EUROMET.M.F-K2
The same scheme is followed for the measurements in key comparison EUROMET.M.F-K2, as explained on page 4 of the EUROMET.M.F-K2 Final Report.
Results obtained by participating laboratories are given in Section 9 (starting on page 14) of the Final Report. The two sets of results (for 50 kN and 100 kN) are shown on Figures 18 and 19 on page 24 of the Final Report.
Date of measurements: 2007 - 2009
CCM.F-K2.a.1
Measurements in key comparisons CCM.F-K2.a.1 were made in scheme A. Detailed description of the measurement results is given in Sections 8 and 9 of the CCM.F-K2.a.1 Final Report.
Date of measurements: 2010 - 2011
APMP.M.F-K2.a and APMP.M.F-K2.b
The same scheme as in CCM.F-K2.a and b is followed for the measurements in key comparisons APMP.M.F-K2.a and .b. The results are given in Section 6 of the APMP.M.F-K2 (a and b) Final report.
Date of measurement: 2004 - 2014
APMP.M.F-K2.1
The measurement results are available in section 2.5 of the APMP.M.F-K2.1 Final report.
Date of measurement: 2018 - 2019
CCM.F-K2.a.1
Measurements in key comparisons CCM.F-K2.a.2 were made in scheme A with measurements perfromed at 5 kN, 10 kN, 20 kN, and 200 kN in adidiotion to 50 kN 100 kN. Detailed description of the measurement results is given in Sections 7 and 8 of the CCM.F-K2.a.2 Final Report.
Date of measurements: 2018 - 2019
CCM.F-K2.a, CCM.F-K2.b, EUROMET.M.F-K2, CCM.F-K2.a.1, APMP.M.F-K2.a, APMP.M.F-K2.b, APMP.M.F-K2.1 and CCM.F-K2.a.2
MEASURAND Force
NOMINAL VALUE 100 kN
CCM.F-K2.a and CCM.F-K2.b
Measurements in key comparisons CCM.F-K2.a and CCM.F-K2.b correspond to the schemes A and B respectively, as explained on page 4 of the CCM.F-K2 (a and b) Final Report. Two transducers are used in scheme A, and three transducers are used in scheme B:
- in scheme A, the two transducers have a nominal capacity of 100 kN and are used to measure 50 kN and 100 kN forces;
- in scheme B, two transducers have a nominal capacity of 50 kN and are used to measure 50 kN forces, and one transducer has a nominal capacity of 100 kN and is used to measure 50 kN forces.
Detailed results of measurements obtained in both key comparisons are given in Section 9 on page 18 of the Final Report. They are then concatenated (see page 30 of the Final Report) in order to provide one set of measurements for 50 kN forces and one set of measurements for 100 kN forces. These two sets of results are shown in Figure 26 and Figure 27 on page 31 of the Final Report.
Date of measurements: 2004 - 2007
EUROMET.M.F-K2
The same scheme is followed for the measurements in key comparison EUROMET.M.F-K2, as explained on page 4 of the EUROMET.M.F-K2 Final Report.
Results obtained by participating laboratories are given in Section 9 (starting on page 14) of the Final Report. The two sets of results (for 50 kN and 100 kN) are shown on Figures 18 and 19 on page 24 of the Final Report.
Date of measurements: 2007 - 2009
CCM.F-K2.a.1
Measurements in key comparisons CCM.F-K2.a.1 were made in scheme A. Detailed description of the measurement results is given in Sections 8 and 9 of the CCM.F-K2.a.1 Final Report.
Date of measurements: 2010 - 2011
APMP.M.F-K2.a and APMP.M.F-K2.b
The same scheme as in CCM.F-K2.a and b is followed for the measurements in key comparisons APMP.M.F-K2.a and .b. The results are given in Section 6 of the APMP.M.F-K2 (a and b) Final report.
Date of measurement: 2004 - 2014
APMP.M.F-K2.1
The measurement results are available in section 2.5 of the APMP.M.F-K2.1 Final report.
Date of measurement: 2018 - 2019
CCM.F-K2.a.1
Measurements in key comparisons CCM.F-K2.a.2 were made in scheme A with measurements perfromed at 5 kN, 10 kN, 20 kN, and 200 kN in adidiotion to 50 kN 100 kN. Detailed description of the measurement results is given in Sections 7 and 8 of the CCM.F-K2.a.2 Final Report.
Date of measurements: 2018 - 2019
