CCM.G-K2, EURAMET.M.G-K2 and SIM.M.G-K1
MEASURAND : Free-fall acceleration
NOMINAL VALUE : 9.81 m/s2
Degrees of equivalence: Dk and expanded uncertainty Uk (k = 2), both expressed in µGal
CCM.G-K2, EURAMET.M.G-K2 and SIM.M.G-K1
MEASURAND : Free-fall acceleration
NOMINAL VALUE : 9.81 m/s2
Degrees of equivalence: Dk and expanded uncertainty Uk (k = 2), both expressed in µGal
CCT.G-K2 EURAMET.M.G-K2 SIM.M.G-K1
Results are presented under A4 printable format in Summary Results (PDF file).
| Metrology area, Sub-field | Mass and related quantities, Gravity |
| Description | Free-fall acceleration |
| Time of measurements | 2015 |
| Status | Approved for equivalence |
| Final Reports of the comparisons | |
| References | |
| Measurand | Free-fall acceleration: 9.81 m/s2 |
| Transfer device | Comparison using absolute gravimeters |
| Comparison type | Key Comparison |
| Consultative Committee | CCM (Consultative Committee for Mass and Related Quantities) |
| Conducted by | EURAMET (European Association of National Metrology Institutes) |
| RMO Internal Identifier | EURAMET Project #1368 |
| Comments | The comparison will be organised as EURAMET.M.G-K2 Key Comparison and Pilot Study and linked to the CCM.G-K2 by means of four joint participants. The results of comparison will be also used for demons. Results published on 7 March 2017 Free-fall acceleration
|
| Pilot institute |
VUGTK/RIGTC
Research Institute of Geodesy, Topography and Cartography Czechia |
| Contact person | Vojtech Pálinkáš +420 323649235 |
| Pilot laboratory | |
|---|---|
| VUGTK/RIGTC |
Research Institute of Geodesy, Topography and Cartography, Czechia, EURAMET |
| FGI |
Finnish Geospatial Research Institute, Finland, EURAMET |
| INRIM |
Istituto Nazionale di Ricerca Metrologica, Italy, EURAMET |
This page proposes print-out on A4 paper (portrait) of the comparison details (best printed out using a black and white printer).
Please, select items to be printed out, then click on "OK" :
CCM.G-K2, EURAMET.M.G-K2 and SIM.M.G-K1
MEASURAND : Free-fall acceleration
NOMINAL VALUE : 9.81 m/s2
|
A weighted least-square adjustement is applied to the set of measurements obtained from absolute gravimeters AG(k) at Stations j, gjk, with standard uncertainty ujk, in order to evaluate the gravity value Gj at each Station j, as well as the offset Dk for absolute gravimeter AG(k), as explained in Section 6.2 "Second and final solution" of the Final Report).
|
| The degree of equivalence of absolute gravimeter AG(k) is given by a pair of terms: Dk and Uk, its expanded uncertainty at a 95 % level of confidence, both expressed in µGal. |
The linkage of EURAMET.M.G-K2 comparison results to CCM.G-K2 comparison results are made by means of four laboratory absolute gravimeters that have been used in both comparisons, and the linking process is described in the EURAMET.M.G-K2 Final Report.
The linkage of SIM.M.G-K1 comparison results to CCM.G-K2 comparison results was made using the FG5X-216 gravimeter through EURAMET.M.G-K2. Tthe linking process is described in the SIM.M.G-K1 Final Report Section 7.3.
CCM.G-K2, EURAMET.M.G-K2 and SIM.M.G-K1
MEASURAND : Free-fall acceleration
NOMINAL VALUE : 9.81 m/s2
AG(k) : absolute gravimeter of Laboratory k
Station j : designation of the station where the measurement was carried out
gjk : gravity value at Station j and height Hjk after substraction of 980 960 000 µGal
ujk : combined standard uncertainty declared by Laboratory k
The comparison was performed in 2013
In general, each participant communicated gravity measurements for three of the fifteen stations used
Raw measurements from Absolute Gravimeters reported by the participants in EURAMET.M.G-K2 are given in Table 4 on page 8 of the Final Report.
The comparison was performed in 2015.
Raw measurements from Absolute Gravimeters reported by the participants in SIM.M.G-K1 are given in Table 5 on pp. 7-8 of the Final Report.
The comparison was performed in 2016.
