From jimr Sun Sep 13 15:50:11 EDT 1998 Received: (from jimr@localhost) by maia.usno.navy.mil (8.8.6 (PHNE_14041)/8.8.6) id PAA00300; Sun, 13 Sep 1998 15:50:11 -0400 (EDT) From: Jim Ray (USNO 202-762-1444)Message-Id: <199809131950.PAA00300@maia.usno.navy.mil> Subject: FAIR clock ??? To: dstowers@jpl.nasa.gov (Dave Stowers (JPL)) Date: Sun, 13 Sep 1998 15:50:11 EDT Cc: steese@icefog.gcgo.nasa.gov (GCGO), jimr@maia.usno.navy.mil X-Mailer: Elm [revision: 212.4] Status: RO At about noon UTC on 10 Sept. 1998, the performance of the FAIR GPS data changed character abruptly, as though the frequency standard had been changed from the H-maser to the internal crystal. (For the 1st half of that day there was no data.) Can you confirm whether there was any change in the frequency standard used as reference for the FAIR receiver? I ask in the context of the IGS/BIPM timing project (http://maia.usno.navy.mil/gpst.html) and FAIR is one of the stations we have been planning to use as a "fiducial clock" station. Thanks, --Jim From steese@icefog.gcgo.nasa.gov Mon Sep 14 11:45:23 EDT 1998 Received: from icefog.gcgo.nasa.gov. (icefog.gcgo.nasa.gov [192.70.244.1]) by maia.usno.navy.mil (8.8.6 (PHNE_14041)/8.8.6) with SMTP id LAA01596 for ; Mon, 14 Sep 1998 11:45:21 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 98 15:36:32 utc Message-Id: <26097@icefog.gcgo.nasa.gov> From: steese@icefog.gcgo.nasa.gov (Gilmore Creek Geophysical Observatory) Reply-To: steese@icefog.gcgo.nasa.gov To: jimr@maia.usno.navy.mil Subject: Re: FAIR clock? Status: RO Jim - The Maser freq. standard was taken down for maintenance about that time frame. The Rogue was later switched to internal reference. At this time the maser is repaired but not reinstalled in its thermal chamber. As soon as this is done we will switch the rogue back to the maser as reference. Steve @ Gilmore Creek GO