From igscb@igscb.jpl.nasa.gov Thu Mar 4 20:52:08 EST 1999 Received: from igscb.jpl.nasa.gov (igscb.jpl.nasa.gov [128.149.70.171]) by maia.usno.navy.mil (8.8.6 (PHNE_14041)/8.8.6) with ESMTP id UAA14052; Thu, 4 Mar 1999 20:52:07 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <199903050152.UAA14052@maia.usno.navy.mil> Received: by igscb.jpl.nasa.gov (1.39.111.2/16.2) id AA255786337; Thu, 4 Mar 1999 17:12:17 -0800 Date: Thu, 4 Mar 1999 17:12:17 -0800 To: IGS Mail RecipientsFrom: IGS Mail Service Reply-To: IGS Mail Administrator Errors-To: IGS Mail Administrator Sender: IGS Mail Administrator Subject: No 2190: TurboRogue L2 tracking update Status: RO ****************************************************************************** IGS Electronic Mail Thu Mar 4 17:12:16 PST 1999 Message Number 2190 ****************************************************************************** Author: J F Zumberge, H J Kunze Subject: TurboRogue L2 tracking update Over the last three months some progress has been made on what's causing the loss of L2 tracking in a TurboRogue (TR) receiver running at 30 sec. (For reference, see IGSmail numbers 2071 and 2075.) The symptom is that, when running at 30 sec in cross correlation mode (normal for TRs when AS is on), tracking on L2 stops when the value of P2 - P1 (actually, P2 - C/A) exceeds 12 m. (A related symptom is that, for 8 m < P2 - C/A < 12 m, the value of P2 - C/A is quantized.) Because P2 - C/A is essentially a measure of the ionosphere, these symptoms are most evident in low-latitude sites. ASC1 (Ascension Island, about -8 deg latitude) exhibits these symptoms in the extreme, and MKEA (Mauna Kea, about +20 deg latitude) to a much lesser, but still noticeable, extent. When running at a 1-sec rate, the TR does _not_ exhibit the symptoms. Limited resources have been available to examine the TurboRogue receiver code. Some of the symptoms are understood, and some very recent findings look promising. In fact, this week we have begun tests at MKEA with modified firmware. At this point we are cautiously optimistic because (i) the quantization symptom has gone away and (ii) the number of low L2 SNR events has decreased significantly (compared, for example, to nearby KOKB, where these events continue to occur in large numbers near local noon). We will be looking at precise analysis of the 1-day data over the next several days. An initial test with the new firmware in a receiver at JPL showed good results from such data. Nevertheless, we need several additional days of testing at MKEA before we are confident that we've found a firmware mod to solve this problem. At this point we expect to have a firmware upgrade that solves the L2 tracking problem along with the GPS week-1024 and Y2K rollover problems. Independently, we have run the receiver at Mauna Kea at 1 sec during much of January, and developed a perl script to mimic the TR's formation of a 30-sec data set. Analyses of these show performance similar to what is typically achieved with normal TR IGS data. We have also run the ASC1 receiver at 1-sec data interval for two days, and are looking at those results now. In the event that the firmware mod does not solve the problem, we expect to be in a position to operate some of our low-latitude TR receivers at the 1-sec data rate. An external PC at the site will periodically offload the data and form the standard 30-sec IGS product. Of course, we should recognize that the TRs represent mature technology. Operators of IGS sites with TRs should consider replacing them with more modern technology, as budgets permit. Sincerely, J F Zumberge, Jet Propulsion Laboratory H J Kunze, Allen Osborne Associates Inc. [Mailed From: jfz@cobra.jpl.nasa.gov]