![]() |
|
![]() |
IGS/BIPM Pilot Project to StudyAccurate Time and Frequency Comparisons Using GPS Phase and Code Measurements |
The International GPS Service (IGS) and the Bureau International des Poids et Mesures (BIPM) established a joint Pilot Project for Time and Frequency Comparisons using GPS in early 1998. The goal of this Pilot Project was to investigate the use of GPS phase and code measurements to improve worldwide availability of accurate time and frequency. The activity was formally ended as a Pilot Project at the end of 2002, after which time the efforts are now aimed at transitioning to more operational modes.
GPS offers the opportunity for highly accurate time and frequency transfer among many remote sites. In analyses of GPS observations, there is a potential for determining clock differences with uncertainties well below one nanosecond, comparable to the best techniques available. To exploit this potential, however, important technical issues remain to be resolved, which this Pilot Project investigated.
The Pilot Project was open to all relevant groups, agencies, and individuals. These activities are not intended to limit in any way the freedom of participants to engage in independent research. The objective was to organize and coordinate efforts among groups to achieve the goals of the Project and to share resources, data, and experiences. The Pilot Project was conducted by a Working Group formed by those who responded to the Call for Participation. The Working Group was co-chaired by Felicitas Arias (BIPM) and Jim Ray (USNO).
|
Related Publications | Calendar of Related Events | Current List of Participants | Index of E-mail |
1st Working Group Meeting -- 22-23 June 1998 at BIPM, Sèvres, France
IGS Network Systems Workshop -- 02-05 November 1998 in Annapolis, Maryland, USA
2nd Working Group Splinter Meeting at PTTI -- 30 November 1998 in Reston, Virginia, USA
30th Precise Time & Time Interval (PTTI)
Meeting -- 01-03 December 1998 in Reston, Virginia, USA
Joint Meeting of the 13th European Frequency and Time Forum and
1999 IEEE International Frequency Control Symposium -- 12-16 April 1999 Besançon, France
14th Meeting of the Consultative Committee for Time and Frequency (CCTF) -- 20-22 April 1999
IGS Analysis Center Workshop -- 08-10 June 1999 at Scripps Institution of Oceanography,
La Jolla, California, USA
31st Precise Time & Time Interval (PTTI) Meeting -- 07-09 December 1999 in Dana Point, California, USA
14th European Frequency and Time Forum -- 14-16 March 2000 in Turin, Italy
IGS Analysis Workshop -- 25-29 September 2000
32nd Precise Time & Time Interval
(PTTI) Meeting -- 28-30 November 2000 in Reston, Virginia, USA
15th European Frequency and Time Forum -- 06-08 March 2001 in
Neuchâtel, Switzerland
15th Meeting of the Consultative Committee for Time and Frequency (CCTF) -- 20-21 June 2001
33rd Precise Time & Time Interval (PTTI)
Meeting -- 27-29 November 2001 in Long Beach, California, USA
16th European Frequency and Time Forum -- 12-14 March 2002 in
St. Petersburg, Russia
4th Intern. Symp. on Time Scale Algorithms -- 18-19 March 2002
at BIPM, Sèvres, France
Setting up a New IGS Station
Only high-quality geodetic-type receivers, capable of collecting dual-frequency pseudorange and carrier phase observations, are used by the IGS. Data are normally collected at a 30-second sampling rate and forwarded to an IGS Data Center within 48 hours (preferably within 1 hour) from the end of the UTC day on which it was collected.
General instructions have been prepared by the Central Bureau for adding a new station to the IGS network and for organizing operations:
- Procedures for Becoming an IGS Station
- Standards for IGS Stations and Operational Centers
- Monumentation Design and Implementation Recommendations
Other sources of IGS general information, especially helpful to new users, can be found at:
- IGS FAQ page
- IGS Publications
- IGS Mail messages
- IGS Reports
To subscribe/unsubscribe to IGS Mail messages or IGS Reports, you can send e-mail to the IGS Central Bureau at Majordomo@igscb2b.jpl.nasa.gov with the following command in the body of your message:
subscribe igsmail [your e-mail address]
or
subscribe igsreports [your e-mail address]
In choosing the name for a new station, the following conventions should be followed:
- A 4-character acronym for each receiver should be proposed to and approved by the IGS Central Bureau (igscb@igscb.jpl.nasa.gov).
- For each geodetic reference point, a DOMES number (a globally unambiguous marker number used by ITRF) must be requested from the ITRF Section of the IERS Central Bureau (see http://lareg.ensg.ign.fr/ITRF/domesreq.html; e-mail contact: domes@ensg.ign.fr).
A log file should be completed and sent to the IGS Central Bureau documenting the configuration of each IGS station. A blank log file may be obtained at ftp://igscb.jpl.nasa.gov/igscb/station/general/blank.log. Procedures for submitting or updating logs are described at http://igscb.jpl.nasa.gov/network/sitelog-submissions.html.
Maintaining up-to-date IGS site log files is critical. Operators are encouraged to include "Additional Information" in the log files for such items as the model type and environmental control for the frequency standard, and cable types, lengths, and stability specifications.
Station operators are urged to report any change in the status of the frequency standard (when an external standard is used) or any other operational aspect that could affect the timing performance of your station. Changes of general interest (such as a new frequency standard) should be reported as timely IGS Mail messages. Notification of other changes expected to affect timing users only can be sent to Jim Ray to post at this site. Such reports are especially important for the "fiducial" clock stations.
Hardware Options
The Consultative Committee for Time and Frequency (CCTF) has asked (Recommendation S5, 2001) that manufacturers of receivers used for timing with global navigation satellite systems (GNSS) implement the technical quidelines for receiver hardware compiled by the CCTF Group on GNSS Time Transfer Standards (CGGTTS). These guidelines aim to achieve a system that can transfer time with an accuracy of 1 ns or better. The guidelines are available here in MS/Word format (34.8 kB).
The University NAVSTAR Consortium (UNAVCO), which supports geoscience research projects, has a very informative Web site containing much useful advice and test reports dealing with many aspects of continuously operating GPS stations.
UNAVCO also maintains a range of helpful software tools. In particular, the teqc toolset provides many useful functions for handling and examining raw GPS data, including RINEX file translation, data editing, and quality checking. For further information, please refer to L.H. Estey & C.M. Meertens, GPS Solutions, 3(1), 42-49, 1999.
Special Study Group 1.158, under Section I of the International Association of Geodesy, presented this report on its findings during the quadrennium 1995-1999. The report addresses the problem of site-specific errors and presents some recommendations on how to handle these errors.
Special Study Group 1.182, under Section I of the International Association of Geodesy, presented this report on its progress for the IAG Travaux 1999-2001. The report addresses detection and mitigation of multipath with the goal of improving geodetic peformance. The Special Study Group also maintains a helpful website.
For information on GPS receivers which allow input of reference signals from external frequency standards, please refer to the following web sites:
A discussion of problems with TurboRogue receiver tracking at low elevation angles, especially under conditions of enhanced ionospheric activity, is given here. A firmware upgrade (version 3.2.32.11) has been released by AOA to correct this problem; for details, please see IGS Mail #3758.
AOA is offerring to retrofit their older TurboRogue models (SNR-8000, SNR-8100, and SNR-12) with their new ACT tracking technology, which is also available in their newer Benchmark models.
At the IGS Network Systems Workshop in November 1998, it was announced that modifications for time transfer applications are now available as the "Metronome" option. This option is currently available only for the rack-mounted Z12 receiver model. The setup requirements for the Metronome-equipped, Z12-T receiver are described here.
Note that the standard, unmodified Ashtech Z12 receiver can also accept an external frequency standard input. However, to ensure that the internal clock is faithfully locked to the external standard, care must be taken to select the proper operational options. The setup procedures have been provided by Rober Snow (Magellan Corp.) for the firmware versions RD00 and CD00; for the Ashtech Z-Surveyor, the setup procedures are given for firmware versions ZB00.
New prices and new receiver models are available in 2001.
For suggestions on signal multipliers to use to synthesize a 20 MHz input frequency from a 5 MHz source, please check here.
All Javad receivers accept input 5, 10 and 20 MHz from external frequency standards to be used as the main oscillator of the receiver.
A Javad JPS Legacy receiver, together with single-depth antenna, was loaned to the NOAA Geosciences Research Division for tests and evaluation. For part of the loan period, it was deployed at USNO near to the current IGS station "USNO", which uses an AOA TurboRogue receiver. The USNO deployment was for 16 days, from 18 March 1999 through 02 April 1999. The Javad station was named "USNJ" and ran from the same external 5 MHz H-maser signal supplied to the USNO receiver. The Javad test data are available at ftp://maia.usno.navy.mil/pub/javad/. An evaluation of the timing performance is available in this report.
Another test for carrier phase time transfers has been organized by Jon Clarke at NPL using a JPS EuroCard receiver. For comparison, RINEX data from their main geodetic receiver (NPLB) and conventional common-view data from a R100 GPS/GLONASS receiver are also available via anonymous ftp. For further information, please refer to this message.
Trimble has announced that its Acutime(TM) 2000 Synchronization Kit is available at trimblestore.com/timing. The Acutime 2000 Synchronization Kit is a high-performance, cost-effective reference time source that precisely synchronizes computers, servers and Internet applications to UTC within 50 ns (1-sigma) using GPS.
Codeless receivers operate by different distinct technologies. As the IGS network transitions from a core of Rogue/TurboRogue (TR) receivers to newer codeless tracking architectures, differences in the pseudorange observables must be considered. The new receivers provide pseudorange observables which can be biased compared with TRs. This is of no significance for data analysts who process only carrier phase observables. For analysts who use the pseudorange observations, their estimates for satellite clocks can depend on the receiver model and the RINEX translation process. To avoid mixing data with different satellite biases, which will degrade the IGS satellite clock products (and precise point positioning using them), recommendations for RINEXing and analysis procedures have been developed to maintain compatibility. For background on this topic, please refer to IGS Mail #2320 and for the change in adopted IGS bias convention, in effect starting 02 April 2000, please refer to IGS Mail #2744. A new class of receiver types was recognized in IGS Mail #3737 (13 Feb 2002). The current (P1-C1) bias values, as well as previous values, are archived in this file.
The beam patterns of GPS antennas generally deviate from the perfectly hemispherical ideal. Effectively, this means that the phase center of the antenna, and hence the geodetic reference point, will depend on the direction of the signal from a particular satellite. Azimuthal variations can usually be ignored and only the elevation angle dependence considered. Neglecting these effects can cause significant errors in station height determinations, up to ~10 cm.
The IGS maintains a table of elevation-dependent phase center corrections for a wide variety of antenna models; see this file. These give the differential corrections relative to the AOA Dorne Margolin T antenna with chokerings (AOAD/M_T). For further information on this topic, please refer to G.L. Mader, GPS Solutions, 3(1), 50-58, 1999.
The antenna phase pattern for the TSA-100 temperature-stabilized antenna from 3S-Navigation were measured by the NGS group and are reported in this message.
For consideration in choosing antenna RF cables, Eric Burt and Ed Powers have assembled a table of specifications giving minimum and maximum delay variations due to temperature changes, as well as attenuation losses at L1 and L2, for a number of Heliax coaxial cable types from Andrew Corp. In addition, Dave Stowers offers some experience at JPL with LMR-400 cables from Times Microwave Systems.
Distribution amplifiers are sometimes needed to split the reference signal from an atomic frequency standard for use by several pieces of equipment. For a distribution amplifier with very high isolation, exceptionally low phase noise, and a very low temperature sensitivity, please check the suggestion here. For suggestions on signal multipliers to use to synthesize a 20 MHz input frequency from a 5 MHz source, please check here.
IGS Stations Colocated at BIPM Timing Laboratories
| IGS Site | Time Lab | GPS Receiver | Freq. Std. | City |
| AMC2 | AMC * | AOA SNR-12 ACT | H-maser | Colorado Springs, CO, USA |
| BOR1 | AOS | AOA TurboRogue | cesium | Borowiec, Poland |
| BRUS | ORB | Ashtech Z-XII3T | H-maser | Brussels, Belgium |
| KGN0 | CRL * | Ashtech Z-XII3 | cesium | Koganei, Japan |
| MDVO | IMVP | Trimble 4000SSE | H-maser | Mendeleevo, Russia |
| MIZU | NAO | AOA Benchmark | cesium | Mizusawa, Japan |
| NPLD | NPL * | Ashtech Z-XII3T | H-maser | Teddington, UK |
| NRC1 | NRC * | AOA SNR-12 ACT | H-maser | Ottawa, Canada |
| NRC2 | NRC * | AOA SNR-8100 ACT | H-maser | Ottawa, Canada |
| OBE2 | DLR | AOA SNR-8000 ACT | rubidium | Oberpfaffenhofen, Germany |
| OPMT | OP | Ashtech Z-XII3T | H-maser | Paris, France |
| PENC | SGO | Trimble 4000SSE | rubidium | Penc, Hungary |
| PTBB | PTB * | AOA TurboRogue | H-maser | Braunschweig, Germany |
| SFER | ROA * | Trimble 4000SSI | cesium | San Fernando, Spain |
| SPT0 | SP | JPS Legacy | cesium | Boras, Sweden |
| TLSE | CNES | AOA TurboRogue | cesium | Toulouse, France |
| TWTF | TL * | Ashtech Z-XII3T | cesium | Taoyuan, Taiwan |
| USNO | USNO * | AOA SNR-12 ACT | H-maser | Washington, DC, USA |
| WTZA | IFAG | Ashtech Z-XII3T | H-maser | Wettzell, Germany |
| WTZR | IFAG | AOA SNR-8000 ACT | H-maser | Wettzell, Germany |
The former timing lab at TUG (GRAZ receiver) ended operations in 2000. In addition to these, several time labs are equipped with geodetic receivers which are not yet incorporated into the IGS network but for which data are publicly available. Some of these are listed below.
| Site Name | Time Lab | GPS Receiver | Freq. Std. | City |
| LPTF | BNM-LPTF | Ashtech Z-XIIT | H-maser | Paris, France |
| NPLF | NPL * | Javad Legacy | H-maser | Teddington, UK |
| ROAH | ROA | AOA TTR4-P | cesium | San Fernando, Spain |
Pascale Defraigne (ORB) and Gérard Petit (BIPM) have written a "Proposal to use geodetic-type receivers for time transfer using the CGGTTS format," which describes a procedure to form standard CGGTTS-format common-view observation files from RINEX data obtained from geodetic GPS receivers. Your comments on this proposal are welcome. This proposed procedure aims to permit time links using calibrated geodetic GPS receivers to be introduced into the TAI calculation. The proposal is available here as a MS/Word document.
A summary of the timing receiver types used at each timing laboratory contributing to TAI are listed here in pdf format (as of April 2000).
Frequency Standards and Other Equipment Deployed at IGS Stations
A summary file of the deployment history for GPS receiver, antenna, frequency standards, and other equipment at IGS stations is given here. This information is extracted automatically from the IGS site logs maintained at http://igscb.jpl.nasa.gov/igscb/station/log/ and is updated daily. It is not entirely reliable, however, due to incomplete or inaccurate log information.
A similar summary file of the current IGS equipment configuration is given here. This file is also updated automatically each day.
Reports which describe events or anomalies that could affect the performance of the frequency standards used at or clock results from IGS Stations are archived here. This information may not be complete.
Time Laboratories Equipped with GLONASS
The time laboratories equipped with GLONASS or GPS+GLONASS receivers (and also participating in the International GLONASS Experiment, IGEX) are listed here. This summary has been prepared by Wlodek Lewandowski (BIPM).
Information on the health and status of the GLONASS constellation is available at http://satnav.atc.ll.mit.edu/.
Selective Availability Discontinued
By decision of the U.S. President, the intentional degradation of the GPS clock signals by Selective Availability (SA) was discontinued at midnight EDT on 01 May 2000 (04:00 UTC on 02 May). This change now allows civilian GPS users to obtain positioning and timing determinations that are more accurate than before by about a factor of up to ten.
From Richard Langley, to the Canadian Space Geodesy Forum on 02 May 2000:
This postscript plot from Tim Springer shows the dramatic improvement in satellite clock stability that occurred on 02 May when SA was turned off. Tim also computed the Allan deviations for all satellites clocks on 06 May 2000, which are shown in this postscript plot.
The benefits of removing SA for using IGS orbit and clock files to perform precise point navigation are discussed by Jan Kouba in IGS Mail #2824.
Reports & Messages Related to Satellite Clocks
E-mail reports describing events, anomalies, or other aspects related to GPS satellite frequency standards are given here.
Satellite Antenna Phase Center Offsets -- Adopted
IGS Values
The vector offsets between the phase centers of the GPS satellite transmit antenna arrays and the satellite centers of mass are not well known. It is the dynamical motion of the centers of mass which must be modelled in the data analysis even though the signals originate from the transmit arrays. Any errors in the radial component of the vector offsets will manifest themselves almost entirely as biases in the estimated values for the satellite clocks. Therefore, in order to ensure that satellite clock determinations from the various IGS Analysis Centers can be compared and combined consistently, the IGS has adopted a common set of values for the antenna phase center offset vectors. The rationale and method for implementing these values is documented here. This set of offset values was officially implemented by the IGS starting 29 November 1998.
In the usual satellite-fixed coordinate system (where the z-axis is directed from the satellite center of mass towards the Earth center), the IGS offset values are:
Block II & IIA dx = 0.279 m dy = 0.000 m dz = 1.023 m Block IIR dx = 0.000 m dy = 0.000 m dz = 0.000 mNote in particular that no offset is used for Block IIR satellites, of which the first was launched in 1997. These values should not be confused with the offsets used by the GPS Operational Control Segment (see following section).
If a user wishes to compare the IGS satellite clock values with other results using different antenna offsets, then corrections must be applied according to:
Csat_i(user) = Csat_i(IGS) - {[ dzi(user) - dzi(IGS) ] / c}
where
dzi(IGS) = IGS value for dz for satellite PRNi dzi(user) = user's value for dz for satellite PRNi Csat_i(IGS) = IGS value for clock of satellite PRNi Csat_i(user) = user's value for clock of satellite PRNi c = speed of light = 299792458 m/s
Satellite Antenna Phase Center Offsets -- Adopted GPS Operations Values
The GPS Operational Control Segment (OCS) uses a different set of values from the IGS for the offsets from the satellite center of mass to the antenna phase centers. The OCS offset values are listed below, in the usual satellite-fixed coordinate system (where the z-axis is directed from the satellite center of mass towards the Earth center):
Block II & IIA dx = 0.2794 m dy = 0.0000 m dz = 0.9519 m
Block IIR dx = 0.0000 m dy = 0.0000 m dz = 1.1725 m (nominal)
Block IIR (actual, until 21:00 on 01 February 2001):
SVN43/PRN13 dx = 0.00310 m dy = -.00122 m dz = 1.17254 m
SVN46/PRN11 dx = 0.01634 m dy = 0.01527 m dz = 1.51500 m
SVN51/PRN20 dx = 0.00216 m dy = 0.00137 m dz = 1.61400 m
SVN44/PRN28 dx = 0.00185 m dy = 0.00066 m dz = 1.51300 m
SVN41/PRN14 dx = -.00183 m dy = -.00018 m dz = 0.86710 m
Block IIR (actual, since 21:00 on 01 February 2001):
SVN43/PRN13 dx = 0.00236 m dy = 0.00249 m dz = 1.61400 m
SVN46/PRN11 dx = 0.00185 m dy = 0.00107 m dz = 1.51406 m
SVN51/PRN20 dx = 0.00203 m dy = 0.00244 m dz = 1.61400 m
SVN44/PRN28 dx = 0.00185 m dy = 0.00066 m dz = 1.51312 m
SVN41/PRN14 dx = 0.00183 m dy = 0.00018 m dz = 1.61366 m
SVN54/PRN18 dx = -.00980 m dy = 0.00599 m dz = 1.59229 m
Note that these offsets should not be confused with the values adopted as
conventional by the IGS (see section above).
Satellite Antenna Phase Center Offsets -- Measured Values
Gerry Mader and his colleagues at NOAA/NGS have made measurements of a Block IIA satellite and determined the z-offset to be 1.66 m (for the ionosphere-corrected LC center offset). For further information, see the site at www.ngs.noaa.gov/ANTCAL.
Effects of Mixed Receiver Types & (P1-C1) Satellite Biases
Codeless receivers operate by different distinct technologies. As the IGS network transitions from a core of Rogue/TurboRogue (TR) receivers to newer codeless tracking architectures, differences in the pseudorange observables must be considered. The new receivers provide pseudorange observables which can be biased compared with TRs. This is of no significance for data analysts who process only carrier phase observables. For analysts who use the pseudorange observations, their estimates for satellite clocks can depend on the receiver model and the RINEX translation process. To avoid mixing data with different satellite biases, which will degrade the IGS satellite clock products (and precise point positioning using them), recommendations for RINEXing and analysis procedures have been developed to maintain compatibility. For background on this topic, please refer to IGS Mail #2320 and for the change in adopted IGS bias convention, in effect starting 02 April 2000, please refer to this IGS Mail #2744. A new class of receiver types was recognized in IGS Mail #3737 (13 Feb 2002). The current (P1-C1) bias values, as well as previous values, are archived in this file.
The CODE Analysis Center provides direct estimates of the satellite differential code bias (DCB) parameters -- refer to http://www.aiub.unibe.ch/ionosphere.html. Starting with GPS week 1057, they now provide (P1-C1) DCB results, in addition to the previous (P1-P2) DCB estimates. For further information, please refer to IGS Mail #2827 by Stefan Schaer.
Starting with data collected 14 January 2001, the set of (P1-C1) bias values recommended for use with official IGS products are those reported at Stefan Schaer's web site; see IGS Mail #3160 (05 January 2001).
Broadcast values for (L1 - L2) biases
JPL now provides estimates of the Tgd values (the L1 - L2 instrumental bias for each GPS satellite) to 2 SOPS every quarter and also monitors the values daily to identify any abrupt changes in the Tgd values due to configuration changes on the satellites. The uploads of the first complete set of biases were completed on 29 April 1999. For a description of the new Tgd values and the changes made please refer to this message.
Monitoring of GPS satellite clocks
GPS & GLONASS Observational Data
GPS and GLONASS observational data are transmitted using the RINEX exchange format; see ftp://igscb.jpl.nasa.gov/igscb/data/format/rinex210.txt. This document also describes navigation message and meteorological data formats. RINEX possesses an option to remove an a priori station clock offset (to the 1 ns level), which is described in a test report.
The organization of the IGS data flow and procedures for accessing the data are described in the memo here.
RINEX format extensions have been adopted for the exchange of a variety of clock data types. The current format version is described here.
Common-View Files from RINEX Data
Pascale Defraigne (ORB) has written software to form standard CGGTTS-format common-view observation files from RINEX data obtained from geodetic GPS receivers. The goal of this tool is to permit time links using calibrated geodetic GPS receivers to be introduced into the TAI calculation. The software is available at ftp://omaftp.oma.be/dist/astro/time/RINEX-CCTF/.
The sp3 format used to exchange satellite orbit and clock information is described in ftp://igscb.jpl.nasa.gov/igscb/data/format/sp3c.txt. The orbits are expressed in an Earth crust-fixed (rotating) frame.
Note that the time tags used in all these files (except the common-view CGGTTS files) are based on GPS time, not UTC.
Clock Analysis Activities
Refinements to the new
time scale were implemented on 28 November 2001 and new a realigned time
scale was released for the IGS Rapid clocks (in addition to the previous Final
products).
Further changes were implemented on 15 February 2002 to refine the clock weights and the Allan deviation confidence limits.
GPS Satellite (P1-C1) Biases
GPS Receiver System Considerations
GPS Antenna Considerations
Calibration of Geodetic Receiver Systems
Time Transfer Comparisons
Web Sites & Reports of Related Work by Participating Groups
|
|
| (content last updated 15 April 2002) | (archived 22 October 2003) |