 Refine your search |
|
| CMC AREA |
|
|
|
|
| PHYSICS |
|
|
|
|
| GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Result of the search |
|
| | | Mexico, CENAM (Centro Nacional de Metrologia) | | | Complete CMCs in Time and Frequency for Mexico (.PDF file)
| | |
| Time scale difference. Local clock, -1 s to +1 s | | Absolute expanded uncertainty (k = 2, level of confidence 95%) in ns: 2 | | Local clock vs. UTC(CNM) | | Averaging time: 1 hour | | Approved on 25 February 2009 |
| | | Time scale difference. Local clock, -1 s to +1 s | | Absolute expanded uncertainty (k = 2, level of confidence 95%) in ns: 20 | | Local clock vs. UTC | | Averaging time: 5 days | | This service requires the publication of the Circular T of the BIPM corresponding to dates when the calibration services were performed in order to know the time difference between the clock under calibration and UTC
Approved on 25 February 2009 |
| | | Time scale difference. Remote clock, -1 s to +1 s | | Absolute expanded uncertainty (k = 2, level of confidence 95%) in ns: 15 | | Remote clock vs. UTC(CNM) | | Averaging time: 1 day | | GPS common-view comparison using multichannel GPS receiver
Approved on 25 February 2009 |
| | | Time scale difference. Remote clock, -1 s to +1 s | | Absolute expanded uncertainty (k = 2, level of confidence 95%) in ns: 25 | | Remote clock vs. UTC | | Averaging time: 5 days | | GPS common-view comparison using multichannel GPS receiver
This service requires the publication of the Circular T of the BIPM corresponding to dates when the calibration services were performed in order to know the time difference between the clock under calibration and UTC
Approved on 25 February 2009 |
|